Joyce Fortune

1.9k total citations
23 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Joyce Fortune is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Management Information Systems and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Joyce Fortune has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 6 papers in Management Information Systems and 4 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Joyce Fortune's work include Construction Project Management and Performance (7 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (4 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers). Joyce Fortune is often cited by papers focused on Construction Project Management and Performance (7 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (4 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers). Joyce Fortune collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Joyce Fortune's co-authors include Diana White, Kam Jugdev, Derek H.T. Walker, David Perkins, Trevor Pearce, Jun Fu, Lin Jiang, H.A. Thompson, John Storey and Michael Johnson and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Project Management, British Journal of Management and Control Engineering Practice.

In The Last Decade

Joyce Fortune

23 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joyce Fortune United Kingdom 11 786 411 329 286 204 23 1.2k
Diana White United Kingdom 7 738 0.9× 379 0.9× 334 1.0× 287 1.0× 193 0.9× 11 1.1k
Erling S. Andersen Norway 20 811 1.0× 389 0.9× 471 1.4× 228 0.8× 157 0.8× 34 1.2k
Peerasit Patanakul United States 21 838 1.1× 381 0.9× 488 1.5× 257 0.9× 163 0.8× 44 1.4k
Walid Belassi Canada 4 653 0.8× 254 0.6× 368 1.1× 279 1.0× 113 0.6× 8 954
Shlomo Globerson Israel 17 684 0.9× 472 1.1× 342 1.0× 225 0.8× 109 0.5× 51 1.4k
Dragan Z. Milosevic United States 17 721 0.9× 382 0.9× 358 1.1× 215 0.8× 170 0.8× 67 1.2k
Frank T. Anbari United States 17 1.1k 1.4× 698 1.7× 744 2.3× 351 1.2× 142 0.7× 27 1.8k
David I. Cleland United States 18 696 0.9× 471 1.1× 577 1.8× 176 0.6× 142 0.7× 39 1.6k
Terry Cooke‐Davies Australia 11 1.5k 1.9× 530 1.3× 780 2.4× 514 1.8× 202 1.0× 18 1.9k
Michael T. Pich France 7 806 1.0× 295 0.7× 601 1.8× 154 0.5× 170 0.8× 9 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Joyce Fortune

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joyce Fortune's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joyce Fortune with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joyce Fortune more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joyce Fortune

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joyce Fortune. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joyce Fortune. The network helps show where Joyce Fortune may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joyce Fortune

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joyce Fortune. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joyce Fortune based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joyce Fortune. Joyce Fortune is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fortune, Joyce, et al.. (2015). From translational research to open technology innovation systems. Journal of Health Organization and Management. 29(2). 200–220. 14 indexed citations
2.
Fortune, Joyce, et al.. (2015). Shared understanding during design and delivery: the case of a large-scale information systems program. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management. 7(4). 327–327. 3 indexed citations
3.
Jugdev, Kam, David Perkins, Joyce Fortune, Diana White, & Derek H.T. Walker. (2013). An exploratory study of project success with tools, software and methods. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 6(3). 534–551. 50 indexed citations
4.
White, Diana & Joyce Fortune. (2012). Using systems thinking to evaluate a major project. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management. 19(2). 205–228. 7 indexed citations
5.
Storey, John, et al.. (2011). THE ADOPTION AND REJECTION PATTERNS OF PRACTITIONER-DEVELOPED TECHNOLOGIES: A REVIEW, A MODEL AND A RESEARCH AGENDA. International Journal of Innovation Management. 15(5). 1043–1067. 4 indexed citations
6.
Fortune, Joyce, Diana White, Kam Jugdev, & Derek H.T. Walker. (2011). Looking again at current practice in project management. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 4(4). 553–572. 73 indexed citations
7.
White, Diana & Joyce Fortune. (2009). The project‐specific Formal System Model. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 2(1). 36–52. 11 indexed citations
8.
Fortune, Joyce, et al.. (2007). Partnership Problems: Analysis and Re-Design. Crime Prevention and Community Safety. 9(1). 34–51. 2 indexed citations
9.
Thompson, H.A., et al.. (2006). A flexible environment for rapid prototyping and analysis of distributed real-time safety-critical systems. Control Engineering Practice. 15(1). 77–94. 15 indexed citations
10.
Fortune, Joyce, et al.. (2005). Information systems: achieving success by avoiding failure. Open Research Online (The Open University). 34 indexed citations
11.
Fortune, Joyce & Diana White. (2005). Framing of project critical success factors by a systems model. International Journal of Project Management. 24(1). 53–65. 418 indexed citations
12.
White, Diana & Joyce Fortune. (2002). Current practice in project management — an empirical study. International Journal of Project Management. 20(1). 1–11. 444 indexed citations
13.
Fortune, Joyce, et al.. (2001). Turning Hindsight into Foresight—Our Search for the “Philosopher's Stone” of Failure. Systemic Practice and Action Research. 14(6). 791–803. 2 indexed citations
14.
Fortune, Joyce, et al.. (1995). An electronic patient record project in the United Kingdom: can it succeed?. PubMed. 8 Pt 1. 301–4. 8 indexed citations
15.
Pearce, Trevor & Joyce Fortune. (1995). Command and Control in Policing: A Systems Assessment of the Gold, Silver and Bronze Structure. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 3(3). 181–187. 16 indexed citations
16.
Fortune, Joyce, et al.. (1995). Application of systems thinking to the identification, avoidance and prevention of risk. International Journal of Project Management. 13(5). 279–286. 23 indexed citations
17.
Fortune, Joyce, et al.. (1994). Systems Analysis of Failures as a Quality Management Tool. British Journal of Management. 5(3). 205–213. 8 indexed citations
18.
Fortune, Joyce, et al.. (1993). Science education in English and Welsh primary schools: a systems study. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 25(4). 359–369. 7 indexed citations
19.
Fortune, Joyce, et al.. (1990). The formal system paradogm for studying failures. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 2(4). 383–390. 10 indexed citations
20.
Fortune, Joyce, et al.. (1984). Understanding Systems Failures. Open Research Online (The Open University). 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026