Joy Harjo

405 citations
20 papers · 100 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Joy Harjo

11 papers receiving 41 citations

Peers

Joy Harjo
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Literature and Literary Theory 32
  • Cultural Studies 21
  • Music 6
  • Health 16
  • Geography, Planning and Development 9
Replace Hertha D. Sweet Wong with:
Hertha D. Sweet Wong United States
Lisa Lowe
G. M. Story Canada
Montague Summers
Maggie Ann Bowers United Kingdom
Rosalind Smith Australia
Jeannine Marie DeLombard Canada
Anna Snaith India
Jayna Brown United States
Bran Nicol United Kingdom
Joy Harjo relative to Hertha D. Sweet Wong United States Hertha D. Sweet Wong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Hertha D. Sweet Wong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joy Harjo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joy Harjo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joy Harjo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joy Harjo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joy Harjo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joy Harjo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joy Harjo. The network helps show where Joy Harjo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Joy Harjo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joy Harjo Line = papers co-authored together Joy Harjo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
She Had Some Horses
198222
2
How we became human : new and selected poems
200417
3 199115
4 19989
5 20068
6 19958
7 19956
8
The Woman Hanging from the Thirteenth Floor Window
19884
9
How we became human
20022
10 19892
11 19972
12
Soul Talk, Song Language: Conversations with Joy Harjo
20112
13 19901
14 19911
15 20001
16
The Pueblo imagination : landscape and memory in the photography of Lee Marmon
20030
17 20220
18 19850
19
Poetry Reading: Third World Women Poets
19800
20 20210

About Joy Harjo

Joy Harjo is a scholar working on Anthropology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Plant Science, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 20 papers that have together received 100 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and Natural History (2 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (1 paper) and American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (32 citations), Cultural Studies (21 citations), Music (6 citations), Health (16 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (9 citations). Joy Harjo has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gloria W. Bird, Elizabeth Cook-Lynn, Mary Beth Adams, Robert L. Berner, Leslie Marmon Silko, S. E. Strom, Simon J. Ortiz, Mary Ellis Gibson and Margaret Randall. Their work appears in journals such as Western American literature, MELUS Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States, World Literature Today, Revue française d’études américaines and The American Indian Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact