Lisa Lowe
- Sociology and Political Science
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Literature and Literary Theory
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Journals
- Cornell University Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
Lisa Lowe
2 papers receiving 59 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Sociology and Political Science 52
- Cultural Studies 16
- Political Science and International Relations 15
- Literature and Literary Theory 9
- Geography, Planning and Development 9
Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Lowe
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Lowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Lowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Lowe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Lowe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Lowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Lowe. The network helps show where Lisa Lowe may publish in the future.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 49 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 32 |
About Lisa Lowe
Lisa Lowe is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 3 papers that have together received 81 indexed citations. The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (16 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (9 citations) and Music (4 citations). Their work appears in journals such as Cornell University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.