Daniel Fulford

2.5k total citations
84 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Daniel Fulford is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Fulford has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 36 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 27 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniel Fulford's work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (32 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (27 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (17 papers). Daniel Fulford is often cited by papers focused on Schizophrenia research and treatment (32 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (27 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (17 papers). Daniel Fulford collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Daniel Fulford's co-authors include Sheri L. Johnson, David E. Gard, Jasmine Mote, Sophia Vinogradov, Charles S. Carver, Rachel Loewy, Danielle Schlosser, Barbara K. Stuart, Kim T. Mueser and Daniel H. Mathalon and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Biological Psychiatry and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Fulford

80 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Fulford United States 23 879 743 551 325 278 84 1.6k
Viviane Thewissen Netherlands 21 847 1.0× 683 0.9× 482 0.9× 253 0.8× 248 0.9× 35 1.5k
Margreet Oorschot Netherlands 17 892 1.0× 964 1.3× 567 1.0× 326 1.0× 221 0.8× 25 1.7k
Stefan Westermann Germany 22 631 0.7× 645 0.9× 665 1.2× 195 0.6× 268 1.0× 58 1.4k
Dina Collip Netherlands 25 924 1.1× 1.0k 1.4× 855 1.6× 521 1.6× 329 1.2× 49 2.3k
Zuzana Kasanova Belgium 18 495 0.6× 704 0.9× 396 0.7× 476 1.5× 146 0.5× 36 1.4k
Andrew Peckham United States 20 707 0.8× 1.1k 1.4× 912 1.7× 514 1.6× 359 1.3× 57 2.2k
David C. Cicero United States 24 819 0.9× 644 0.9× 857 1.6× 271 0.8× 256 0.9× 71 1.8k
Derek J. Dean United States 23 671 0.8× 352 0.5× 528 1.0× 432 1.3× 219 0.8× 44 1.5k
David E. Gard United States 21 1.4k 1.6× 1.4k 1.9× 755 1.4× 751 2.3× 288 1.0× 46 2.6k
Gerdina H. M. Pijnenborg Netherlands 25 1.3k 1.5× 569 0.8× 770 1.4× 550 1.7× 339 1.2× 99 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Fulford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Fulford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Fulford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Fulford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Fulford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Fulford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Fulford. The network helps show where Daniel Fulford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Fulford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Fulford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Fulford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Fulford. Daniel Fulford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Borrelli, Belinda, et al.. (2024). Behavioral Activation Mobile App to Motivate Smokers to Quit: Feasibility and Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Formative Research. 8. e54912–e54912. 1 indexed citations
3.
Fulford, Daniel, Lisa A. Marsch, & Abhishek Pratap. (2024). Prescription Digital Therapeutics: An Emerging Treatment Option for Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry. 96(8). 659–665. 4 indexed citations
4.
Mote, Jasmine, et al.. (2023). The Influence of Greenspace Exposure on Affect in People With and Those Without Schizophrenia: Exploratory Study. JMIR Formative Research. 7. e44323–e44323. 3 indexed citations
6.
Fulford, Daniel, et al.. (2023). Formative evaluation of an entrepreneurial funding mechanism for training knowledge brokers in occupational therapy relevant research spaces. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin. 79(2). 236–247. 1 indexed citations
7.
Cavanaugh, James T., Ryan P. Duncan, Daniel Fulford, et al.. (2022). Does clinically measured walking capacity contribute to real-world walking performance in Parkinson's disease?. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 105. 123–127. 5 indexed citations
8.
Fulford, Daniel, et al.. (2022). Do cognitive impairments limit treatment gains in a standalone digital intervention for psychosis? A test of the digital divide. Schizophrenia Research Cognition. 28. 100244–100244. 4 indexed citations
9.
Cavanaugh, James T., Cristina Colón-Semenza, Tamara R. DeAngelis, et al.. (2021). Are Mobile Persons With Parkinson Disease Necessarily More Active?. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy. 45(4). 259–265. 4 indexed citations
10.
McGurk, Susan R., et al.. (2021). A longitudinal analysis of employment in people with severe mental illnesses in India. Schizophrenia Research. 228. 472–480. 3 indexed citations
11.
Mueser, Kim T., et al.. (2020). Employment functioning in people with severe mental illnesses living in urban vs. rural areas in India. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 55(12). 1593–1606. 20 indexed citations
12.
Mote, Jasmine & Daniel Fulford. (2019). Ecological momentary assessment of everyday social experiences of people with schizophrenia: A systematic review. Schizophrenia Research. 216. 56–68. 71 indexed citations
13.
Curtiss, Joshua, Daniel Fulford, Stefan G. Hofmann, & Anda Gershon. (2019). Network dynamics of positive and negative affect in bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders. 249. 270–277. 31 indexed citations
14.
Loewy, Rachel, Daniel Fulford, Rahel Pearson, et al.. (2018). Childhood trauma and clinical high risk for psychosis. Schizophrenia Research. 205. 10–14. 86 indexed citations
15.
Fulford, Daniel, et al.. (2013). Emotion perception and quality of life in bipolar I disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders. 152-154. 491–497. 50 indexed citations
16.
Fulford, Daniel, Tara A. Niendam, Cameron S. Carter, et al.. (2013). Symptom dimensions and functional impairment in early psychosis: More to the story than just negative symptoms. Schizophrenia Research. 147(1). 125–131. 79 indexed citations
17.
Fulford, Daniel, et al.. (2013). Positive Affect Enhances the Association of Hypomanic Personality and Cognitive Flexibility. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 6(1). 1–16. 10 indexed citations
18.
Fulford, Daniel, et al.. (2009). The Cognition Checklist for Mania—Revised (CCL-M-R): Factor-Analytic Structure and Links with Risk for Mania, Diagnoses of Mania, and Current Symptoms. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2(4). 313–324. 9 indexed citations
19.
Johnson, Sheri L. & Daniel Fulford. (2008). Preventing Mania: A Preliminary Examination of the GOALS Program. Behavior Therapy. 40(2). 103–113. 40 indexed citations
20.
Johnson, Sheri L. & Daniel Fulford. (2008). Development of the treatment attitudes questionnaire in bipolar disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 64(4). 466–481. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026