Daniel Fulford

2.5k citations
84 papers · 1.6k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Fulford

80 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Daniel Fulford
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 879
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 743
  • Applied Psychology 218
  • Biological Psychiatry 71
  • Clinical Psychology 551
Replace Stefan Westermann with:
Stefan Westermann Germany
Viviane Thewissen Netherlands
Bryony Sheaves United Kingdom
David C. Cicero United States
Gerdina H. M. Pijnenborg Netherlands
Mark R. Serper United States
Andrew Peckham United States
Hélène Haker Switzerland
Michael C. Zinser United States
Janice R. Kuo Canada
Daniel Fulford relative to Stefan Westermann Germany Stefan Westermann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Stefan Westermann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Fulford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Fulford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Fulford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Fulford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Fulford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Fulford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Fulford. The network helps show where Daniel Fulford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Fulford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Fulford Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Fulford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201893
2 201886
3 201379
4 201478
5 201377
6 201575
7 201971
8 201669
9 200853
10 201053
11 201350
12 202049
13 202048
14 201942
15 200840
16 201239
17 201637
18 201931
19 201730
20 202127

About Daniel Fulford

Daniel Fulford is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (32 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (27 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (17 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (16 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (10 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (8 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (879 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (743 citations), Applied Psychology (218 citations), Biological Psychiatry (71 citations) and Clinical Psychology (551 citations). Daniel Fulford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sheri L. Johnson, David E. Gard, Jasmine Mote, Sophia Vinogradov, Charles S. Carver, Rachel Loewy, Danielle Schlosser, Barbara K. Stuart, Kim T. Mueser and Daniel H. Mathalon. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Psychiatry Research, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Journal of Affective Disorders and Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact