Josh Nohle
About
In The Last Decade
Josh Nohle
7 papers receiving 519 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 499
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 331
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 174
- Geometry and Topology 26
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 19
Countries citing papers authored by Josh Nohle
This map shows the geographic impact of Josh Nohle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josh Nohle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josh Nohle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Josh Nohle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josh Nohle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josh Nohle. The network helps show where Josh Nohle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Josh Nohle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Josh Nohle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Josh Nohle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Josh Nohle. Josh Nohle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46 | |
| 2 | 52 | |
| 3 | 54 | |
| 4 | 100 | |
| 5 | 114 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | 124 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.