Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine
19662.2k citationsJoseph WeizenbaumCommunications of the ACMprofile →
ELIZA — a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine
19831.4k citationsJoseph WeizenbaumCommunications of the ACMprofile →
Computer power and human reason
1976625 citationsJoseph Weizenbaum et al.profile →
Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgement to Calculation.
1977469 citationsJoseph Weizenbaum et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Weizenbaum
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Weizenbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Weizenbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Weizenbaum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Weizenbaum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Weizenbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Weizenbaum. The network helps show where Joseph Weizenbaum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph Weizenbaum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph Weizenbaum.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph Weizenbaum based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph Weizenbaum. Joseph Weizenbaum is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Weizenbaum, Joseph. (2010). Computermacht und Gesellschaft.
Weizenbaum, Joseph, et al.. (2001). Computermacht und Gesellschaft : Freie Reden. Suhrkamp eBooks.2 indexed citations
4.
Weizenbaum, Joseph. (1991). Against the imperialism of instrumental reason. 728–742.1 indexed citations
5.
Weizenbaum, Joseph. (1991). Computer Power And Human Reason: From Judgement To Calculation. Medical Entomology and Zoology.208 indexed citations
6.
Weizenbaum, Joseph. (1986). Not without us. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society. 16(2-3). 2–7.2 indexed citations
7.
Steiner, Rudolf & Joseph Weizenbaum. (1985). The renewal of the social organism. Medical Entomology and Zoology.7 indexed citations
8.
Weizenbaum, Joseph. (1983). ELIZA — a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM. 26(1). 23–28.1444 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Weizenbaum, Joseph. (1978). Once more—a computer revolution. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 34(7). 12–19.3 indexed citations
Weizenbaum, Joseph. (1962). Knotted list structures. Communications of the ACM. 5(3). 161–165.21 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.