Joseph W. Houpt

1.2k total citations
64 papers, 709 citations indexed

About

Joseph W. Houpt is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Joseph W. Houpt has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 709 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 15 papers in Social Psychology and 11 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Joseph W. Houpt's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (29 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (11 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers). Joseph W. Houpt is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (29 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (11 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers). Joseph W. Houpt collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Joseph W. Houpt's co-authors include James T. Townsend, Leslie M. Blaha, Ami Eidels, Chris Donkin, Daniel R. Little, Nathan A. Bowling, Paul R. Havig, John P. McIntire, Nicholas Altieri and Elizabeth Fox and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.

In The Last Decade

Joseph W. Houpt

61 papers receiving 683 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joseph W. Houpt United States 14 462 224 176 87 70 64 709
Ami Eidels Australia 18 578 1.3× 262 1.2× 265 1.5× 92 1.1× 78 1.1× 73 939
Mackenzie G. Glaholt Canada 14 521 1.1× 188 0.8× 132 0.8× 80 0.9× 169 2.4× 25 810
Stephen W. Link Canada 11 437 0.9× 176 0.8× 67 0.4× 89 1.0× 116 1.7× 22 727
Richard A. Chechile United States 20 506 1.1× 149 0.7× 138 0.8× 270 3.1× 191 2.7× 67 895
Andrea Schankin Germany 14 373 0.8× 179 0.8× 74 0.4× 62 0.7× 48 0.7× 34 642
Jonathan Levy United States 6 221 0.5× 66 0.3× 254 1.4× 46 0.5× 33 0.5× 8 678
Ion Juvina United States 14 253 0.5× 125 0.6× 84 0.5× 148 1.7× 92 1.3× 49 644
Michael J. Schoelles United States 12 209 0.5× 114 0.5× 213 1.2× 171 2.0× 60 0.9× 46 637
Lydia Tan United Kingdom 11 615 1.3× 198 0.9× 67 0.4× 165 1.9× 156 2.2× 15 723
Guanxiong Pei China 14 187 0.4× 143 0.6× 111 0.6× 46 0.5× 17 0.2× 40 440

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph W. Houpt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph W. Houpt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph W. Houpt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph W. Houpt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph W. Houpt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph W. Houpt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph W. Houpt. The network helps show where Joseph W. Houpt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph W. Houpt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph W. Houpt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph W. Houpt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph W. Houpt. Joseph W. Houpt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Makhanova, Anastasia, et al.. (2024). Immune response and intergroup bias: Vaccine-induced increases in cytokine activity are associated with worse evaluations of resume for Latina job applicant. Brain Behavior and Immunity. 122. 555–564. 1 indexed citations
2.
Garrett, Paul Michael, et al.. (2023). Chinese holistic processing: Evidence from cognitive mental architecture using Systems Factorial Technology. Heliyon. 9(9). e19736–e19736.
3.
Fox, Elizabeth, et al.. (2023). An extension of the shifted Wald model of human response times: Capturing the time dynamic properties of human cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 31(3). 1057–1077. 1 indexed citations
4.
Houpt, Joseph W., et al.. (2023). How Do People Process Information from Automated Decision Aids: an Application of Systems Factorial Technology. Computational Brain & Behavior. 7(1). 106–128. 2 indexed citations
5.
Houpt, Joseph W., et al.. (2022). Fundamental tools for developing likelihood functions within ACT-R. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 107. 102636–102636. 4 indexed citations
6.
Houpt, Joseph W., et al.. (2021). Functional analysis of trajectories from multiple devices during a preferential choice task.. Decision. 8(4). 346–366. 1 indexed citations
7.
Bowling, Nathan A., et al.. (2020). Will the Questions Ever End? Person-Level Increases in Careless Responding During Questionnaire Completion. Organizational Research Methods. 24(4). 718–738. 61 indexed citations
8.
Houpt, Joseph W., et al.. (2020). Temporal organization of color and shape processing during visual search. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 82(2). 426–456. 3 indexed citations
9.
Houpt, Joseph W., et al.. (2019). Spatial Auditory Cueing for a Dynamic Three-Dimensional Virtual Reality Visual Search Task. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 63(1). 1766–1770. 3 indexed citations
10.
Houpt, Joseph W., et al.. (2018). A Comparison of Approximations for Base-Level Activation in ACT-R. Computational Brain & Behavior. 1(3-4). 228–236. 2 indexed citations
11.
Houpt, Joseph W., et al.. (2017). Unsupervised parsing of gaze data with a beta-process vector auto-regressive hidden Markov model. Behavior Research Methods. 50(5). 2074–2096. 8 indexed citations
12.
Hawkins, Robert D., Joseph W. Houpt, Ami Eidels, & James T. Townsend. (2015). Can two dots form a Gestalt? Measuring emergent features with the capacity coefficient. Vision Research. 126. 19–33. 9 indexed citations
13.
Godwin, H. J., et al.. (2015). Faster than the speed of rejection: Object identification processes during visual search for multiple targets.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 41(4). 1007–1020. 19 indexed citations
14.
Heathcote, Andrew, Ami Eidels, Joseph W. Houpt, et al.. (2014). Multitasking in Working Memory. Cognitive Science. 36(36). 601–606. 3 indexed citations
15.
Fox, Elizabeth, et al.. (2014). Evaluation of Cognitive Processing in Redundant Audio-Visual Signals.. Cognitive Science. 36(36). 2 indexed citations
16.
Houpt, Joseph W., et al.. (2013). Functional principal components analysis of workload capacity functions. Behavior Research Methods. 45(4). 1048–1057. 20 indexed citations
17.
Houpt, Joseph W. & James T. Townsend. (2011). An extension of SIC predictions to the Wiener coactive model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 55(3). 267–270. 17 indexed citations
18.
Houpt, Joseph W. & James T. Townsend. (2010). A New Perspective on Visual Word Processing Efficiency. Journal of Bioresource Management. 32(32). 2 indexed citations
19.
Houpt, Joseph W., et al.. (2010). Facial Perception as a Configural Process. Journal of Vision. 10(7). 688–688. 2 indexed citations
20.
Eidels, Ami, et al.. (2010). Nice guys finish fast and bad guys finish last: Facilitatory vs. inhibitory interaction in parallel systems. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 55(2). 176–190. 66 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026