Joseph Schwager
- Immunology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Louis Du PasquierMartin F. FlajnikNiels BürckertMichèle CourtetDario GrossbergerIrandokht Hadji‐AzimiSalme TimmuskInes Warnke
- Topics
- T-cell and B-cell Immunology (7 papers)Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (6 papers)Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandNetherlandsFrance
In The Last Decade
Joseph Schwager
22 papers receiving 799 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Immunology 465
- Molecular Biology 316
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 153
- Global and Planetary Change 65
- Genetics 57
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Schwager
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Schwager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Schwager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Schwager more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Schwager
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Schwager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Schwager. The network helps show where Joseph Schwager may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph Schwager
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph Schwager. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph Schwager based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph Schwager. Joseph Schwager is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 48 | |
| 4 | 67 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 38 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 60 | |
| 9 | 46 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 215 | |
| 15 | 52 | |
| 16 | 74 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | Biochemical studies of Xenopus laevis lymphocytes surface immunoglobulins. | 8 |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | Immune electron optical examinations of the cell wall antigens of oncolytic clostridia. | 1 |
About Joseph Schwager
Joseph Schwager is a scholar working on Aging, Immunology and Toxicology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 834 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include T-cell and B-cell Immunology (7 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (6 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (465 citations), Microbiology (55 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (51 citations). Joseph Schwager has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Louis Du Pasquier, Martin F. Flajnik, Niels Bürckert, Michèle Courtet, Dario Grossberger, Irandokht Hadji‐Azimi, Salme Timmusk, Ines Warnke, Sylvie Partula and Lars Pilström. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The EMBO Journal and The Journal of Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.