Joseph Mango
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Community Health and Development
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences Research and Education
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
Papers in
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 3
- Community Health and Development 3
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 3
-
- Art Therapy and Mental Health 2
- Co-authors
- Andrea Jones (3 shared papers)Felica Jones (3 shared papers)Dmitry Khodyakov (2 shared papers)Susan E. Stockdale (2 shared papers)Kenneth B. Wells (6 shared papers)Armen C. Arevian (2 shared papers)Loretta Jones (1 shared paper)David J. Miklowitz (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Health Promotion Practice (1 paper)Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts (1 paper)Community Mental Health Journal (1 paper)Health Education & Behavior (1 paper)Ethnicity & Disease (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Joseph Mango
8 papers receiving 199 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- General Health Professions 106
- Applied Psychology 9
- Health 8
- Clinical Psychology 20
- Conservation 3
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Mango
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Mango's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Mango with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Mango more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Mango
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Mango. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Mango. The network helps show where Joseph Mango may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Mango, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 73 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 8 | Community Partners in Care (CPIC): Video Summary of Rationale, Study Approach / Implementation, and Client 6-month Outcomes. | 2014 | 1 |
About Joseph Mango
Joseph Mango is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Conservation, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Community Health and Development (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (2 papers), Education and Military Integration (1 paper), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (1 paper) and Global Health Workforce Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (106 citations), Applied Psychology (9 citations), Health (8 citations), Clinical Psychology (20 citations) and Conservation (3 citations). Joseph Mango has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Jones, Felica Jones, Dmitry Khodyakov, Susan E. Stockdale, Kenneth B. Wells, Armen C. Arevian, Loretta Jones, David J. Miklowitz, Kia Skrine Jeffers and Lily Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Health Promotion Practice, Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, Community Mental Health Journal, Health Education & Behavior and Ethnicity & Disease.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.