Anna Lawrence‐Jones

401 citations
10 papers · 161 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Lawrence‐Jones

10 papers receiving 158 citations

Peers

Anna Lawrence‐Jones
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Clinical Psychology 35
  • General Health Professions 32
  • Statistics and Probability 10
  • Family Practice 2
  • Applied Psychology 5
Replace Celeste Liebrecht with:
Celeste Liebrecht United States
L Rutherford United Kingdom
Catherine Gimbrone United States
Zeina Mneimneh United States
Catharina Linderoth Sweden
Patrícia Bitencourt Toscani Greco Brazil
Beth DelConte United States
Patricia Junquera United States
Lucy Fletcher United Kingdom
Heather Colquhoun Canada
Anna Lawrence‐Jones relative to Celeste Liebrecht United States Celeste Liebrecht's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Celeste Liebrecht · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Lawrence‐Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Lawrence‐Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Lawrence‐Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Lawrence‐Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Lawrence‐Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Lawrence‐Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Lawrence‐Jones. The network helps show where Anna Lawrence‐Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Lawrence‐Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Lawrence‐Jones Line = papers co-authored together Anna Lawrence‐Jones links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 202149
2 202046
3 202225
4 202124
5 20227
6 20245
7 20202
8 20251
9 20211
10 20231

About Anna Lawrence‐Jones

Anna Lawrence‐Jones is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Health, Family Practice and Rehabilitation, having authored 10 papers that have together received 161 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (1 paper), Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (1 paper), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (1 paper) and Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (35 citations), General Health Professions (32 citations), Statistics and Probability (10 citations), Family Practice (2 citations) and Applied Psychology (5 citations). Anna Lawrence‐Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Paul Aylin, Lindsay H. Dewa, Mary Lavelle, Sofia Pappa, Noémi Kreif, Erik Mayer, Alex Bottle, Mauricio Barahona, Martina Di Simplicio and Dasha Nicholls. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, International Journal for Population Data Science, International Journal of Epidemiology, Journal of Adolescent Health and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact