Joseph E. McEwen

584 total citations
8 papers, 107 citations indexed

About

Joseph E. McEwen is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Joseph E. McEwen has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 107 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 4 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 3 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in Joseph E. McEwen's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (4 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers). Joseph E. McEwen is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (4 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers). Joseph E. McEwen collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Mexico. Joseph E. McEwen's co-authors include David H. Weinberg, J. Blazek, Christopher M. Hirata, Stephan Ormonde, J. William McGowan, Shirley Ho, Will J. Percival, Hee‐Jong Seo, M. Vargas-Magaña and Graziano Rossi and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

In The Last Decade

Joseph E. McEwen

7 papers receiving 104 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Joseph E. McEwen United States	5	81	25	24	17	9	8	107
K. van der Heyden South Africa	7	153 1.9×	86 3.4×	24 1.0×	14 0.8×	4 0.4×	11	165
Matthew Hasselfield United States	6	161 2.0×	68 2.7×	48 2.0×	15 0.9×	9 1.0×	16	187
J. P. Le Fèvre France	6	74 0.9×	37 1.5×	36 1.5×	18 1.1×	2 0.2×	7	98
E. Recillas Mexico	8	184 2.3×	43 1.7×	45 1.9×	8 0.5×	3 0.3×	22	192
J. W. Richardson United States	5	95 1.2×	50 2.0×	13 0.5×	41 2.4×	16 1.8×	8	125
Maria Cristina Fortuna Netherlands	4	137 1.7×	32 1.3×	80 3.3×	14 0.8×	7 0.8×	5	145
V. Villar Spain	8	243 3.0×	37 1.5×	123 5.1×	16 0.9×	3 0.3×	12	255
D. Shenoy United States	8	119 1.5×	18 0.7×	17 0.7×	14 0.8×	3 0.3×	13	127
Ilsang Yoon United States	11	220 2.7×	49 2.0×	55 2.3×	20 1.2×	6 0.7×	27	234
C. Bonoli Italy	6	112 1.4×	13 0.5×	32 1.3×	17 1.0×	4 0.4×	19	129

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph E. McEwen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph E. McEwen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph E. McEwen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph E. McEwen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph E. McEwen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph E. McEwen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph E. McEwen. The network helps show where Joseph E. McEwen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph E. McEwen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph E. McEwen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph E. McEwen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph E. McEwen. Joseph E. McEwen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Digman, Matthew C., Joseph E. McEwen, & Christopher M. Hirata. (2019). Forecasting super-sample covariance in future weak lensing surveys with SuperSCRAM. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2019(10). 4–4. 4 indexed citations

2.

McEwen, Joseph E. & David H. Weinberg. (2018). The effects of assembly bias on the inference of matter clustering from galaxy–galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 477(4). 4348–4361. 24 indexed citations

3.

Slepian, Zachary, Daniel J. Eisenstein, J. Blazek, et al.. (2017). Constraining the baryon–dark matter relative velocity with the large-scale three-point correlation function of the SDSS BOSS DR12 CMASS galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 474(2). 2109–2115. 31 indexed citations

4.

Blazek, J., Joseph E. McEwen, & Christopher M. Hirata. (2016). Streaming Velocities and the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Scale. Physical Review Letters. 116(12). 121303–121303. 30 indexed citations

5.

McEwen, Joseph E., et al.. (2011). The $\alpha-\alpha$ fishbone potential revisited. arXiv (Cornell University).

6.

McEwen, Joseph E., et al.. (2011). Reexamination of theα−α“fishbone” potential. Physical Review C. 84(3). 1 indexed citations

7.

McEwen, Joseph E., et al.. (2009). Two-body Problems with Confining Potentials. Few-Body Systems. 47(1-2). 17–23. 2 indexed citations

8.

Ormonde, Stephan, Joseph E. McEwen, & J. William McGowan. (1969). Comparison of the Calculated and Observed Resonances in thee−HElastic-Scattering Channel above 10.0 eV. Physical Review Letters. 22(22). 1165–1167. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact