Zachary Slepian
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Signal Processing
- Co-authors
- Daniel J. EisensteinR. N. CahnJiamin HouOliver H. E. PhilcoxNick HandYin LiU. SeljakShirley Ho
- Topics
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (26 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (17 papers)Scientific Research and Discoveries (10 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPhysical Review LettersMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyMexico
In The Last Decade
Zachary Slepian
36 papers receiving 822 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 720
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 205
- Instrumentation 203
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 127
- Signal Processing 35
Countries citing papers authored by Zachary Slepian
This map shows the geographic impact of Zachary Slepian's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zachary Slepian with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zachary Slepian more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Zachary Slepian
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zachary Slepian. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zachary Slepian. The network helps show where Zachary Slepian may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Zachary Slepian
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Zachary Slepian. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Zachary Slepian based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Zachary Slepian. Zachary Slepian is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | nbodykit: Massively parallel, large-scale structure toolkit | 1 |
| 16 | The Cosmic Accelerometer | 1 |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | 72 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Zachary Slepian
Zachary Slepian is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 828 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (26 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (17 papers) and Scientific Research and Discoveries (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (203 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (720 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (205 citations). Zachary Slepian has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Eisenstein, R. N. Cahn, Jiamin Hou, Oliver H. E. Philcox, Nick Hand, Yin Li, U. Seljak, Shirley Ho, Will J. Percival and Chia-Hsun Chuang. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Physical Review Letters and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.