Joseph Dalaker

480 citations
10 papers · 377 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Joseph Dalaker

10 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

Joseph Dalaker
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Gender Studies 65
  • Health 48
  • General Health Professions 111
  • Clinical Psychology 78
  • Sociology and Political Science 126
Replace Dena Hassouneh with:
Dena Hassouneh United States
Claudette E. Bennett United States
Elizabeth M. Grieco United States
Alma Angélica Villa-Rueda Mexico
Carrie Brown United States
Judith Johnson United States
Judith A. Levine United States
Nicholas J. Ford United Kingdom
Eileen McLeod United Kingdom
Iris Carlton-LaNey United States
Joseph Dalaker relative to Dena Hassouneh United States Dena Hassouneh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dena Hassouneh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Dalaker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Dalaker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Dalaker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Dalaker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Dalaker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Dalaker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Dalaker. The network helps show where Joseph Dalaker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Dalaker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph Dalaker Line = papers co-authored together Joseph Dalaker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1998192
2 200663
3 200251
4
Poverty in the United States: 2001. Current Population Reports.
200242
5
Poverty in the United States, 1999. Current Population Reports.
200010
6
Poverty in the United States: 2000. Consumer Income. Current Population Reports.
20017
7
Demographic and Social Characteristics of Persons in Poverty: 2015
20165
8
The Supplemental Poverty Measure: Its Core Concepts, Development, and Use
20173
9
The 10-20-30 Rule and Persistent Poverty Counties
20173
10
An Introduction to Poverty Measurement
20171

About Joseph Dalaker

Joseph Dalaker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Oncology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 10 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural Economics and Policy (1 paper), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 paper), Cancer Risks and Factors (1 paper), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (1 paper) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (65 citations), Health (48 citations), General Health Professions (111 citations), Clinical Psychology (78 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (126 citations). Joseph Dalaker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Bernadette D. Proctor, Janet Royalty, Donald Blackman, Ralph J. Coates, Florence K. L. Tangka, Ingrid J. Hall, Amy DeGroff, James G. Gardner and Sajal K. Chattopadhyay. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Causes & Control, University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) and PsycEXTRA Dataset.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact