Josef Guber

481 citations
26 papers · 306 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Josef Guber

25 papers receiving 289 citations

Peers

Josef Guber
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Ophthalmology 93
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 210
  • Neurology 22
  • Surgery 50
  • Pharmacy 4
Replace Andrew Simpson with:
Andrew Simpson United Kingdom
Yaprak Banu Ünver Türkiye
Fangzheng Jiang China
Homayoun Nikkhah Iran
Jeffrey Gale Canada
Amin Nabavi Iran
B. Harder Germany
Pierre Zéboulon France
C Monin France
Sidney A. Schechet United States
Josef Guber relative to Andrew Simpson United Kingdom Andrew Simpson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Andrew Simpson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Josef Guber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Josef Guber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josef Guber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josef Guber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Josef Guber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josef Guber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josef Guber. The network helps show where Josef Guber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Josef Guber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Josef Guber Line = papers co-authored together Josef Guber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201133
2 201030
3 201925
4 201922
5 200721
6 201921
7 201918
8 201216
9 201916
10 201715
11 202014
12 201911
13 201810
14 20149
15 20189
16 20158
17 20208
18 20215
19 20214
20 20143

About Josef Guber

Josef Guber is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Neurology, Surgery and Instrumentation, having authored 26 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal and Macular Surgery (16 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (5 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (1 paper), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (93 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (210 citations), Neurology (22 citations), Surgery (50 citations) and Pharmacy (4 citations). Josef Guber has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christophe Valmaggia, Ivo Guber, Hendrik P. N. Scholl, Markus Weber, Lucas M. Bachmann, Markus K. Müller, Stefan Wildi, Michael Thiel, Alex P. Lange and Frank Bochmann. Their work appears in journals such as Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Clinical ophthalmology, BMC Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology and Therapy and Obesity Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact