José Storópoli
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Clinical Psychology
- Information Systems and Management top 10%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gustavo S. MeschMarcos FerassoEran Vigoda‐GadotAaron LiuTan YiğitcanlarÉmerson Antônio MaccariFernando Antônio Ribeiro SerraManuel Portugal Ferreira
- Topics
- Business and Management Studies (12 papers)Innovation and Knowledge Management (6 papers)Education and Public Policy (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Business and International ManagementInformation Systems and ManagementManagement of Technology and Innovation
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Cleaner ProductionSocial Science & Medicine
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
José Storópoli
40 papers receiving 349 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Strategy and Management 71
- Sociology and Political Science 65
- Clinical Psychology 51
- Information Systems and Management 44
- Management of Technology and Innovation 39
Countries citing papers authored by José Storópoli
This map shows the geographic impact of José Storópoli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José Storópoli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José Storópoli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by José Storópoli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by José Storópoli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José Storópoli. The network helps show where José Storópoli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of José Storópoli
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of José Storópoli. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of José Storópoli based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with José Storópoli. José Storópoli is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 49 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | Topic Modeling IJSM-RIAE | 1 |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About José Storópoli
José Storópoli is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Strategy and Management and Applied Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Business and Management Studies (12 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (6 papers) and Education and Public Policy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (14 citations), Information Systems and Management (44 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (39 citations). José Storópoli has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Gustavo S. Mesch, Marcos Ferasso, Eran Vigoda‐Gadot, Aaron Liu, Tan Yiğitcanlar, Émerson Antônio Maccari, Fernando Antônio Ribeiro Serra, Manuel Portugal Ferreira, Priscila Rezende da Costa and Natalie A. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Cleaner Production and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.