José Rama
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Communication top 5%
- Gender Studies
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Andrés SantanaStuart J. Turnbull‐DugarteFernando Casal BértoaLisa ZanottiGuillermo CorderoJosé Javier Olivas OsunaVincenzo EmanueleJosé Ramón Montero Gibert
- Topics
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements (29 papers)Electoral Systems and Political Participation (17 papers)Social Media and Politics (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Journal of PoliticsJournal of democracy
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomChile
In The Last Decade
José Rama
42 papers receiving 495 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Political Science and International Relations 423
- Sociology and Political Science 193
- Communication 113
- Gender Studies 36
- Artificial Intelligence 26
Countries citing papers authored by José Rama
This map shows the geographic impact of José Rama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José Rama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José Rama more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by José Rama
This network shows the impact of papers produced by José Rama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José Rama. The network helps show where José Rama may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of José Rama
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of José Rama. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of José Rama based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with José Rama. José Rama is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 82 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About José Rama
José Rama is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Communication and General Social Sciences, having authored 45 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Populism, Right-Wing Movements (29 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (17 papers) and Social Media and Politics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (423 citations), Communication (113 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (193 citations). José Rama has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Andrés Santana, Stuart J. Turnbull‐Dugarte, Fernando Casal Bértoa, Lisa Zanotti, Guillermo Cordero, José Javier Olivas Osuna, Vincenzo Emanuele, José Ramón Montero Gibert, Salvador Parrado and Josep Lobera. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of Politics and Journal of democracy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.