José Luis Flores
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Applied Mathematics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Geometry and Topology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Miguel SánchezAnna María CandelaMiguel Ángel JavaloyesPaolo PiccioneN. DomínguezKerstin E. KunzeK. GofronMarc Mars
- Topics
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (24 papers)Advanced Differential Geometry Research (22 papers)Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (22 papers)
In The Last Decade
José Luis Flores
35 papers receiving 281 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 261
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 169
- Applied Mathematics 167
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 66
- Geometry and Topology 62
Countries citing papers authored by José Luis Flores
This map shows the geographic impact of José Luis Flores's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José Luis Flores with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José Luis Flores more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by José Luis Flores
This network shows the impact of papers produced by José Luis Flores. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José Luis Flores. The network helps show where José Luis Flores may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of José Luis Flores
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of José Luis Flores. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of José Luis Flores based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with José Luis Flores. José Luis Flores is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | A Quadratic Bolza—Type Problem in a Riemannian Manifold | 1 |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About José Luis Flores
José Luis Flores is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (24 papers), Advanced Differential Geometry Research (22 papers) and Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (261 citations), Applied Mathematics (167 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (169 citations). José Luis Flores has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Brazil and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Miguel Sánchez, Anna María Candela, Miguel Ángel Javaloyes, Paolo Piccione, N. Domínguez, Kerstin E. Kunze, K. Gofron, Marc Mars, Miguel Angel Vázquez-Mozo and Yong Q. Cai. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, American Journal of Physics and Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.