Jose Cortes-Briones
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Patrick D. SkosnikDeepak Cyril D’SouzaMohini RanganathanRajiv RadhakrishnanBrian PittmanJohn D. CahillToral SurtiHalle Thurnauer
- Topics
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (15 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers)Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChileJamaica
In The Last Decade
Jose Cortes-Briones
24 papers receiving 803 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Pharmacology 538
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 366
- Cognitive Neuroscience 241
- Psychiatry and Mental health 120
- Molecular Biology 67
Countries citing papers authored by Jose Cortes-Briones
This map shows the geographic impact of Jose Cortes-Briones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jose Cortes-Briones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jose Cortes-Briones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jose Cortes-Briones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jose Cortes-Briones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jose Cortes-Briones. The network helps show where Jose Cortes-Briones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jose Cortes-Briones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jose Cortes-Briones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jose Cortes-Briones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jose Cortes-Briones. Jose Cortes-Briones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 48 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 127 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 77 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 145 | |
| 18 | 53 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Jose Cortes-Briones
Jose Cortes-Briones is a scholar working on Toxicology, Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 26 papers that have together received 810 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (15 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (538 citations), Biological Psychiatry (65 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (366 citations). Jose Cortes-Briones has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Jamaica. Frequent co-authors include Patrick D. Skosnik, Deepak Cyril D’Souza, Mohini Ranganathan, Rajiv Radhakrishnan, Brian Pittman, John D. Cahill, Toral Surti, Halle Thurnauer, Mihály Hajós and Richard E. Carson. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Biological Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.