Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
KRAS and YAP1 Converge to Regulate EMT and Tumor Survival
2014573 citationsDiane D. Shao, Wen Xue et al.Cellprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jong W. Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jong W. Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jong W. Kim more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jong W. Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jong W. Kim. The network helps show where Jong W. Kim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jong W. Kim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jong W. Kim.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jong W. Kim based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jong W. Kim. Jong W. Kim is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kim, Jong W., et al.. (2018). Towards a physio-cognitive model of deep slow-breathing.. Cognitive Science.2 indexed citations
3.
Kim, Jong W., et al.. (2018). Towards using a physio-cognitive model in tutoring for psychomotor tasks.. Bucknell Digital Commons (Bucknell University).1 indexed citations
4.
Kim, Jong W. & Frank E. Ritter. (2016). Microgenetic analysis of learning a task: ITS implications to cognitive modeling. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research. 21–26.1 indexed citations
Ritter, Frank E., et al.. (2013). Declarative to Procedural Tutors: A Family of Cognitive Architecture-Based Tutors. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research. 108–113.4 indexed citations
11.
Ritter, Frank E., Jong W. Kim, Jonathan H. Morgan, & Richard A. Carlson. (2012). How to Run Experiments: A Practical Guide to Research with Human Participants.
12.
Kim, Jong W.. (2011). Teamwork in MultiAgent Systems: A Formal Approach (Wiley Series in Agent Technology) by Barbara Maria Dunin-Keplicz and Rineke Verbrugge .. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. 14.7 indexed citations
Kim, Jong W., et al.. (2010). Building large learning models with herbal. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research. 187–192.2 indexed citations
15.
Kim, Jong W. & Frank E. Ritter. (2007). Automatically recording keystrokes in public clusters with RUI: issues and sample answers. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 29(29).4 indexed citations
16.
Kim, Jong W., Richard J. Koubek, & Frank E. Ritter. (2007). Investigation of procedural skills degradation from different modalities. 39(4). 138–43.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.