Jonathan Ott

625 citations
23 papers · 400 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Ott

20 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers

Jonathan Ott
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Toxicology 50
  • Clinical Psychology 302
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 122
  • Pharmacology 77
  • Organic Chemistry 126
Replace Albert Hofmann with:
Albert Hofmann
Gregorio Gómez-Jarabo Spain
Jochen Gartz Germany
Joseph P. Barsuglia United States
Udo Schneider Germany
Mercedes Yritia Spain
Walter N. Pahnke United States
F.X. Vollenweider Switzerland
John Rhead United States
W. R. McLeod New Zealand
Jonathan Ott relative to Albert Hofmann Albert Hofmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Albert Hofmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Ott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Ott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Ott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Ott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Ott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Ott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Ott. The network helps show where Jonathan Ott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Ott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Ott Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Ott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Hoasca ethnomedicine: Traditional use of "nove vegetais" ("nine herbs") by the Uniao do vegetal
20111
2 20061
3 200143
4 200153
5 1999100
6 199819
7
Pharmacotheon: drogas enteógenas, sus fuentes vegetales y su historia
19961
8
NEW FARES UNDERSCORE DISPARITY OF DEREGULATED MARKETPLACE
19851
9 19844
10 19810
11 19808
12 197986
13 19798
14
Teonanacatyl. Hallucinogenic mushrooms of North America.
19784
15
Hallucinogenic Plants of North America
197713
16 19764
17 19766
18 19768
19 19766
20 197616

About Jonathan Ott

Jonathan Ott is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Organic Chemistry and Pharmacology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (10 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (6 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (2 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (2 papers) and Synthesis and bioactivity of alkaloids (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (50 citations), Clinical Psychology (302 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (122 citations), Pharmacology (77 citations) and Organic Chemistry (126 citations). Jonathan Ott has collaborated with scholars based in Mexico, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include R. Gordon Wasson, Carl A. P. Ruck, Gastón Guzmán, Alexander H. Smith, Albert Hofmann, Amanda Feilding, Catherine S. Thompson, A. Hofmann and Beatriz Caiuby Labate. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, Mycologia, Economic Botany, Aviation week & space technology and Botanical Museum leaflets Harvard University.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026