Jonathan Mitchell

703 citations
41 papers · 293 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Mitchell

36 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

Jonathan Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Philosophy 62
  • Social Psychology 104
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 84
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 14
  • Ecological Modeling 18
Replace Nathan Nobis with:
Nathan Nobis United States
Jessica Pierce United States
Elisa Aaltola Finland
James Warren United States
Nicolae Morar United States
Andrew Linzey United Kingdom
GW Smith United States
G. K. D. Crozier Canada
Christopher Belshaw United Kingdom
Michael Crouch United States
Jonathan Mitchell relative to Nathan Nobis United States Nathan Nobis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Nathan Nobis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Mitchell. The network helps show where Jonathan Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200752
2 201534
3 201722
4 202120
5 201817
6 201716
7 201915
8 201211
9 19739
10 20219
11 20229
12 20188
13 20088
14 20196
15 20196
16 20026
17 20196
18 20205
19 20085
20 20194

About Jonathan Mitchell

Jonathan Mitchell is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotions and Moral Behavior (19 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (3 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (62 citations), Social Psychology (104 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (84 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (14 citations) and Ecological Modeling (18 citations). Jonathan Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Francis C. Golet, Peter W. C. Paton, Eddy Lang, Ariella Lang, Mélanie Lavoie‐Tremblay, Melissa Griffin, Neil J. MacKinnon, Patrícia Marck, Geneviève L. Lavigne and Marilyn Macdonald. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Inquiry, European Journal of Philosophy, Synthese and dialectica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact