Nathan Nobis

690 citations
38 papers · 300 indexed · h-index 8
Topics
Animal testing and alternatives (11 papers)Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers)Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers)

In The Last Decade

Nathan Nobis

34 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

Nathan Nobis
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Social Psychology 76
  • Small Animals 67
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 66
  • Genetics 58
  • Philosophy 54
Replace Andrew Linzey with:
Andrew Linzey United Kingdom
Elisa Aaltola Finland
Óscar Horta Spain
Jeff Sebo United States
Paola Cavalieri Italy
Carrie Packwood Freeman United States
Richard D. Ryder United Kingdom
Stephen Cooke United Kingdom
Evelyn B. Pluhar United States
Morten Tønnessen Norway
Nathan Nobis relative to Andrew Linzey United Kingdom Andrew Linzey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Andrew Linzey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Nobis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Nobis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Nobis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Nobis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Nobis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Nobis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Nobis. The network helps show where Nathan Nobis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan Nobis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan Nobis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan Nobis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan Nobis. Nathan Nobis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
The Philosophers’ Brief on Elephant Personhood
1
2 4
3 3
4
Xenotransplantation, Subsistence Hunting and the Pursuit of Health: Lessons for Animal Rights-Based Vegan Advocacy
0
5 24
6 0
7 3
8 2
9 1
10 2
11 1
12 78
13
Animals and Rights
2
14
Truth in Ethics and Epistemology: A Defense of Normative Realism
1
15 2
16
Ayer and Stevenson’s Epistemological Emotivisms
4
17 25
18
So Why Does Animal Experimentation Matter
2
19 2
20 2

About Nathan Nobis

Nathan Nobis is a scholar working on Small Animals, Philosophy and Religious studies, having authored 38 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal testing and alternatives (11 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (67 citations), Philosophy (54 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (23 citations). Nathan Nobis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Scott O. Lilienfeld, Randy Malamud, Lori Marino, Ari R. Joffe, Natalie Anton, David Graham, L. Syd M Johnson, Sue Donaldson, Kristin Andrews and Gary Comstock. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, ILAR Journal and BMC Medical Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026