Nathan Nobis

690 total citations
38 papers, 300 citations indexed

About

Nathan Nobis is a scholar working on Small Animals, Philosophy and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathan Nobis has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 300 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Small Animals, 7 papers in Philosophy and 5 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Nathan Nobis's work include Animal testing and alternatives (11 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers). Nathan Nobis is often cited by papers focused on Animal testing and alternatives (11 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers). Nathan Nobis collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Africa. Nathan Nobis's co-authors include Scott O. Lilienfeld, Randy Malamud, Lori Marino, Ari R. Joffe, Natalie Anton, David Graham, L. Syd M Johnson, Sue Donaldson, Kristin Andrews and Gary Comstock and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, ILAR Journal and BMC Medical Ethics.

In The Last Decade

Nathan Nobis

34 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nathan Nobis United States	8	76	67	66	58	54	38	300
Paola Cavalieri Italy	7	59 0.8×	38 0.6×	61 0.9×	63 1.1×	37 0.7×	23	282
Stephen Cooke United Kingdom	2	37 0.5×	52 0.8×	75 1.1×	102 1.8×	46 0.9×	4	440
Elisa Aaltola Finland	10	64 0.8×	24 0.4×	48 0.7×	52 0.9×	30 0.6×	33	248
Carrie Packwood Freeman United States	10	63 0.8×	27 0.4×	22 0.3×	47 0.8×	29 0.5×	27	299
Jeff Sebo United States	10	21 0.3×	44 0.7×	89 1.3×	32 0.6×	40 0.7×	30	250
Óscar Horta Spain	10	44 0.6×	68 1.0×	104 1.6×	94 1.6×	72 1.3×	32	417
Andrew Linzey United Kingdom	11	30 0.4×	42 0.6×	57 0.9×	67 1.2×	87 1.6×	42	335
Richard D. Ryder United Kingdom	7	26 0.3×	45 0.7×	34 0.5×	45 0.8×	19 0.4×	20	172
Evelyn B. Pluhar United States	8	19 0.3×	31 0.5×	34 0.5×	45 0.8×	22 0.4×	23	226
Alasdair Cochrane United Kingdom	13	17 0.2×	59 0.9×	111 1.7×	94 1.6×	95 1.8×	26	543

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Nobis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Nobis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Nobis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Nobis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Nobis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Nobis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Nobis. The network helps show where Nathan Nobis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan Nobis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan Nobis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan Nobis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan Nobis. Nathan Nobis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Comstock, Gary, G. K. D. Crozier, Andrew Fenton, et al.. (2020). The Philosophers’ Brief on Elephant Personhood. 1 indexed citations

Nobis, Nathan, et al.. (2019). Thinking Critically About Abortion: Why Most Abortions Aren't Wrong & Why All Abortions Should Be Legal. 4 indexed citations

Nobis, Nathan. (2019). Why IACUCs Need Ethicists. ILAR Journal. 60(3). 324–333. 3 indexed citations

Nobis, Nathan. (2018). Xenotransplantation, Subsistence Hunting and the Pursuit of Health: Lessons for Animal Rights-Based Vegan Advocacy. DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University). 21(1). 8.

Joffe, Ari R., et al.. (2016). The ethics of animal research: a survey of the public and scientists in North America. BMC Medical Ethics. 17(1). 17–17. 24 indexed citations

Nobis, Nathan. (2016). Animals & Ethics 101: Thinking Critically About Animal Rights.

Joffe, Ari R., et al.. (2015). Expectations for methodology and translation of animal research: a survey of health care workers. BMC Medical Ethics. 16(1). 29–29. 3 indexed citations

Joffe, Ari R., et al.. (2014). The ethics of animal research: a survey of pediatric health care workers. Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine. 9(1). 20–20. 2 indexed citations

Nobis, Nathan. (2011). Abortion, Metaphysics and Morality: A Review of Francis Beckwith's Defending Life: A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 36(3). 261–273. 1 indexed citations

10.

Nobis, Nathan. (2011). The Harmful, Nontherapeutic Use of Animals in Research Is Morally Wrong. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 342(4). 297–304. 2 indexed citations

11.

Malamud, Randy, et al.. (2011). Strong Claims, Feeble Evidence: A Rejoinder to Falk et al. (2010). Society and Animals. 19(3). 291–293. 1 indexed citations

12.

Malamud, Randy, et al.. (2010). Do Zoos and Aquariums Promote Attitude Change in Visitors? A Critical Evaluation of the American Zoo and Aquarium Study. Society and Animals. 18(2). 126–138. 78 indexed citations

13.

Graham, David & Nathan Nobis. (2007). Animals and Rights. 8(2). 2 indexed citations

14.

Nobis, Nathan. (2005). Truth in Ethics and Epistemology: A Defense of Normative Realism. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 1 indexed citations

15.

Nobis, Nathan. (2005). Feminist Ethics without Feminist Ethical Theory (Or, More Generally, “φ Ethics without φ Ethical Theory”). Journal of Philosophical Research. 30(9999). 213–225. 2 indexed citations

16.

Nobis, Nathan. (2004). Ayer and Stevenson’s Epistemological Emotivisms. Croatian Journal of Philosophy. 4(1). 59–79. 4 indexed citations

17.

Nobis, Nathan. (2004). Carl Cohen's ‘Kind’ Arguments For Animal Rights and Against Human Rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 21(1). 43–59. 25 indexed citations

18.

Nobis, Nathan. (2003). So Why Does Animal Experimentation Matter. The American Journal of Bioethics. 3(1). 2 indexed citations

19.

Nobis, Nathan. (2002). Animal Dissection and Evidence-Based Life-Science and Health-Professions Education. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 5(2). 157–161. 2 indexed citations

20.

Nobis, Nathan, et al.. (2002). WHO NEEDS THE ’ACTUAL FUTURES PR/NCIPLE’?. Southwest Philosophy Review. 18(2). 55–63. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact