Jonathan M. Fraser
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Applied Mathematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- K. J. FalconerPablo ShmerkinAntti KäenmäkiTuomas OrponenL. OlsenHaipeng ChenMike ToddAlice Lam
- Topics
- Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (40 papers)Advanced Topology and Set Theory (19 papers)Topological and Geometric Data Analysis (10 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Mathematical Analysis and ApplicationsTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietyAdvances in Mathematics
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSlovakiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jonathan M. Fraser
37 papers receiving 218 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Mathematical Physics 212
- Geometry and Topology 104
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 52
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 44
- Applied Mathematics 37
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan M. Fraser
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan M. Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan M. Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan M. Fraser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan M. Fraser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan M. Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan M. Fraser. The network helps show where Jonathan M. Fraser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan M. Fraser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan M. Fraser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan M. Fraser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan M. Fraser. Jonathan M. Fraser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 41 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Jonathan M. Fraser
Jonathan M. Fraser is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology and Applied Mathematics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 233 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (40 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (19 papers) and Topological and Geometric Data Analysis (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (212 citations), Geometry and Topology (104 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (44 citations). Jonathan M. Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Slovakia and United States. Frequent co-authors include K. J. Falconer, Pablo Shmerkin, Antti Käenmäki, Tuomas Orponen, L. Olsen, Haipeng Chen, Mike Todd, Alice Lam, Andrew K. C. Wong and Jeremy T. Tyson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society and Advances in Mathematics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.