Jonathan Leib

30 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Jonathan Leib
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Geography, Planning and Development 95
  • Space and Planetary Science 12
  • Urban Studies 49
  • Sociology and Political Science 256
  • Political Science and International Relations 127
Replace Ruth Craggs with:
Ruth Craggs United Kingdom
Robert Aldrich Australia
Owen J. Dwyer United States
Martin Coward United Kingdom
Saree Makdisi United States
Harvey J. Kaye United States
David Atkinson United Kingdom
Thomas Richards United States
Karal Ann Marling United States
Shannon Lee Dawdy United States
Jonathan Leib relative to Ruth Craggs United Kingdom Ruth Craggs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Ruth Craggs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Leib

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Leib's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Leib with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Leib more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Leib

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Leib. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Leib. The network helps show where Jonathan Leib may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Leib, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Leib Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Leib links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200285
2 200154
3 199540
4 200225
5 201024
6 199823
7 199822
8 200022
9 200421
10 199717
11 200215
12 201212
13 200711
14 199810
15 201010
16 201610
17 20169
18 19977
19 20027
20 20107

About Jonathan Leib

Jonathan Leib is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Marketing, Geography, Planning and Development and Social Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American History and Culture (8 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (4 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (4 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (3 papers) and Photography and Visual Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (95 citations), Space and Planetary Science (12 citations), Urban Studies (49 citations), Sociology and Political Science (256 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (127 citations). Jonathan Leib has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ghana and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Gerald R. Webster, Jason Dittmer, T. E. Chapman, Fred M. Shelley, Julian Archer, Peyton McCrary, David Jansson, George W. White and Simon Dalby. Their work appears in journals such as Southeastern geographer, Journal of Geography, Political Geography, Geographical Review and GeoJournal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact