Jonathan Lawson
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 7
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 2
- Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research 1
- Co-authors
- Stephen Albert Johnston (3 shared papers)C. Rick Lyons (2 shared papers)Gregory T. Rushton (2 shared papers)Harold R. Garner (2 shared papers)Vasiliki Rahimzadeh (5 shared papers)Edward S. Dove (3 shared papers)Kevin O’Brien (1 shared paper)Nishanth Marthandan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biopreservation and Biobanking (3 papers)BioTechniques (2 papers)DNA and Cell Biology (2 papers)Cell Genomics (2 papers)BMC Medical Ethics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFinland
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Lawson
10 papers receiving 78 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Health Informatics 5
- Information Systems and Management 8
- Parasitology 6
- Management Science and Operations Research 11
- Genetics 22
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Lawson
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Lawson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Lawson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Lawson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Lawson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Lawson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Lawson. The network helps show where Jonathan Lawson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Lawson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 22 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 0 |
About Jonathan Lawson
Jonathan Lawson is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Information Systems, Ecology and Genetics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 82 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (7 papers), Research Data Management Practices (4 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (3 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (2 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers), Data Quality and Management (2 papers) and Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (5 citations), Information Systems and Management (8 citations), Parasitology (6 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (11 citations) and Genetics (22 citations). Jonathan Lawson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Albert Johnston, C. Rick Lyons, Gregory T. Rushton, Harold R. Garner, Vasiliki Rahimzadeh, Edward S. Dove, Kevin O’Brien, Nishanth Marthandan, Yuri Belosludtsev and Kevin J Luebke. Their work appears in journals such as Biopreservation and Biobanking, BioTechniques, DNA and Cell Biology, Cell Genomics and BMC Medical Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.