Jonathan Havercroft

530 citations
27 papers · 184 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Havercroft

23 papers receiving 167 citations

Peers

Jonathan Havercroft
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Political Science and International Relations 93
  • Development 9
  • Sociology and Political Science 104
  • Philosophy 17
  • Education 43
Replace Iftikhar H. Malik with:
Iftikhar H. Malik United Kingdom
Dietrich Jung Denmark
Sarbeswar Sahoo India
Abdelwahab El‐Affendi United Kingdom
Roel Meijer Netherlands
Natana J. DeLong‐Bas United States
Martin Nonhoff Germany
Modesto Florenzano Brazil
Jonathan Schell United States
David Fromkin
Jonathan Havercroft relative to Iftikhar H. Malik United Kingdom Iftikhar H. Malik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Iftikhar H. Malik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Havercroft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Havercroft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Havercroft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Havercroft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Havercroft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Havercroft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Havercroft. The network helps show where Jonathan Havercroft may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Havercroft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Havercroft Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Havercroft links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201235
2 201925
3 201618
4 201714
5 202113
6 201112
7 201710
8 20179
9 20088
10 20186
11 20206
12 20096
13 20124
14 20243
15 20233
16 20193
17 20232
18 20102
19 20191
20 20111

About Jonathan Havercroft

Jonathan Havercroft is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Education and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 27 papers that have together received 184 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (3 papers), International Law and Human Rights (3 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (3 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (3 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (93 citations), Development (9 citations), Sociology and Political Science (104 citations), Philosophy (17 citations) and Education (43 citations). Jonathan Havercroft has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Raymond Duvall, Alex Prichard, David Owen, Justin Murphy, Isaac Kamola, Antje Wiener, Jo Shaw, Val Napoleón, Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mattias Kumm. Their work appears in journals such as Global Constitutionalism, Political Theory, Journal of Political Science Education, Paragraph and Social Science Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact