John Boswell

5.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
72 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

John Boswell is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Public Administration. According to data from OpenAlex, John Boswell has authored 72 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 25 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 15 papers in Public Administration. Recurrent topics in John Boswell's work include Public Policy and Administration Research (15 papers), Social Media and Politics (13 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (8 papers). John Boswell is often cited by papers focused on Public Policy and Administration Research (15 papers), Social Media and Politics (13 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (8 papers). John Boswell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. John Boswell's co-authors include Alan Bray, Mark D. Jordan, David L. Ransel, Carolyn M. Hendriks, Jack Corbett, John C. Moore, Selen A. Ercan, Cecilia Benoit, Rikki Dean and Graham Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and The American Historical Review.

In The Last Decade

John Boswell

65 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality 1981 2026 1996 2011 1981 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Boswell United Kingdom 22 897 526 326 262 234 72 2.2k
George Lipsitz United States 20 1.7k 1.9× 250 0.5× 154 0.5× 203 0.8× 338 1.4× 100 2.9k
Frank Füredi United Kingdom 24 1.4k 1.6× 406 0.8× 92 0.3× 214 0.8× 200 0.9× 77 2.5k
Cary Nelson United States 18 916 1.0× 358 0.7× 113 0.3× 123 0.5× 253 1.1× 108 2.1k
Iwona Irwin-Zarecka 8 1.2k 1.3× 435 0.8× 219 0.7× 405 1.5× 69 0.3× 11 1.9k
Patrick H. Hutton United States 11 936 1.0× 278 0.5× 131 0.4× 141 0.5× 235 1.0× 45 1.9k
Matthew Frye Jacobson United States 10 1.7k 1.9× 254 0.5× 174 0.5× 112 0.4× 195 0.8× 24 2.4k
Darlene Clark Hine United States 19 1.5k 1.7× 341 0.6× 265 0.8× 78 0.3× 250 1.1× 96 2.1k
Joan W. Scott United States 13 1.4k 1.6× 412 0.8× 522 1.6× 181 0.7× 711 3.0× 24 2.6k
Kate Kenny Ireland 21 1.2k 1.3× 326 0.6× 79 0.2× 236 0.9× 400 1.7× 57 2.3k
Inderpal Grewal United States 17 1.4k 1.5× 386 0.7× 207 0.6× 126 0.5× 715 3.1× 34 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by John Boswell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Boswell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Boswell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Boswell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Boswell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Boswell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Boswell. The network helps show where John Boswell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Boswell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Boswell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Boswell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Boswell. John Boswell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Durose, Catherine, et al.. (2026). A Chequered History but Positive Future for British Public Administration. Public Administration Review.
2.
Cairney, Paul, et al.. (2025). New political science analysis of the renewed push for preventive health: ‘Can it be any different this time around?’. Social Science & Medicine. 384. 118568–118568.
3.
Boswell, John, Jack Corbett, Dennis Grube, & Mari‐Klara Stein. (2024). How does government feel? Toward a theory of institutional pathos in public administration. Public Administration Review. 85(4). 962–972.
4.
Mukherjee, Maitreyee, Md Shakhawat Hossain, John Boswell, et al.. (2024). Large, but short-term, increase in fecal indicator bacteria following extreme flooding from Hurricane Harvey in Houston, TX. Frontiers in Water. 6. 2 indexed citations
5.
Flinders, Matthew, Sarah Ayres, John Boswell, et al.. (2024). Power with Purpose? Further Reflections on Strengthening the Centre of Government. The Political Quarterly. 95(3). 544–552. 8 indexed citations
6.
Cairney, Paul, Emily St Denny, & John Boswell. (2022). Why is health improvement policy so difficult to secure?. Open Research Europe. 2. 76–76. 2 indexed citations
7.
Boswell, John, et al.. (2022). The Potential of Meta-ethnography in the Study of Public Administration: A Worked Example on Social Security Encounters in Advanced Liberal Democracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 33(4). 593–605. 4 indexed citations
8.
Cairney, Paul, Emily St Denny, & John Boswell. (2022). Why is health improvement policy so difficult to secure?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 76–76. 9 indexed citations
9.
Boswell, John, Paul Cairney, & Emily St Denny. (2019). The politics of institutionalizing preventive health. Social Science & Medicine. 228. 202–210. 18 indexed citations
10.
Boswell, John, Jack Corbett, Katharine Dommett, et al.. (2018). State of the field: What can political ethnography tell us about anti‐politics and democratic disaffection?. European Journal of Political Research. 58(1). 56–71. 27 indexed citations
11.
Boswell, John & Jack Corbett. (2017). Why and how to compare deliberative systems. European Journal of Political Research. 56(4). 801–819. 20 indexed citations
12.
Boswell, John & Jack Corbett. (2015). Who are we trying to impress?. Journal of Organizational Ethnography. 4(2). 223–235. 4 indexed citations
13.
Ercan, Selen A., Carolyn M. Hendriks, & John Boswell. (2015). Studying public deliberation after the systemic turn: the crucial role for interpretive research. Policy & Politics. 45(2). 195–212. 64 indexed citations
14.
Boswell, John & Jack Corbett. (2015). On making an impression: a response to our critics. Critical Policy Studies. 9(3). 375–379. 2 indexed citations
15.
Boswell, John & Jack Corbett. (2014). Introduction: Interpretation in the Study of Australian Politics and Policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 73(3). 291–295. 1 indexed citations
16.
Hendriks, Carolyn M., Selen A. Ercan, & John Boswell. (2013). Understanding Deliberative Systems in Practice: The Crucial Role for Interpretive Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
17.
Boswell, John. (1996). The marriage of likeness : same-sex unions in pre-modern Europe. 21 indexed citations
18.
Boswell, John. (1996). Les unions du même sexe : dans l'Europe antique et médiévale. Fayard eBooks. 2 indexed citations
19.
Boswell, John & Francesca Olivieri. (1991). L'abbandono dei bambini in Europa occidentale. Rizzoli eBooks.
20.
Boswell, John. (1989). Jews, Bicycle Riders, and Gay People: The Determination of Social Consensus and Its Impact on Minorities. Yale journal of law & the humanities. 1(2). 1. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026