Jonathan G. Levine

9 papers receiving 617 citations

Peers

Jonathan G. Levine
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Toxicology 44
  • Health Informatics 11
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 32
  • Applied Psychology 24
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 69
Replace Mark Berendsen with:
Mark Berendsen United States
Siân Rees United Kingdom
Evangelia Liakoni Switzerland
Mette T. Haahr Denmark
Robert E. Johnstone United States
Julie L. Cunningham United States
Yongbo Zheng China
Andrew B. Lanto United States
Kari L. Franson United States
Stéphane Schück France
Jonathan G. Levine relative to Mark Berendsen United States Mark Berendsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mark Berendsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan G. Levine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan G. Levine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan G. Levine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan G. Levine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan G. Levine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan G. Levine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan G. Levine. The network helps show where Jonathan G. Levine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan G. Levine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan G. Levine Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan G. Levine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2001200
2 2002156
3 2006107
4 201572
5 200841
6 201330
7 202226
8 200216
9 20211

About Jonathan G. Levine

Jonathan G. Levine is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Toxicology, Surgery, Neurology and Rehabilitation, having authored 9 papers that have together received 649 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (2 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (1 paper), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (1 paper), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (1 paper), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper), Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (1 paper) and Neural Networks and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (44 citations), Health Informatics (11 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (32 citations), Applied Psychology (24 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (69 citations). Jonathan G. Levine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert N. Jamison, Stephen A. Raymond, Nathaniel P. Katz, Ana Szarfman, Joseph M. Tonning, Srdjan S. Nedeljković, Ellen Slawsby, P. Murali Doraiswamy, Margaret Daly and Richard H. Gracely. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy and Drug Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact