Jonathan Field

645 total citations
21 papers, 430 citations indexed

About

Jonathan Field is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Field has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 430 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Pharmacology, 5 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 5 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Field's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (13 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers). Jonathan Field is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (13 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers). Jonathan Field collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Jonathan Field's co-authors include David Newell, Michelle M. Holmes, Felicity L. Bishop, George Lewith, D. F. W. Pollard, Jeffrey Lipman, Jason A. Roberts, Carl M. J. Kirkpatrick, Peter W. McCarthy and Brent Richards and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy and Quality of Life Research.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Field

19 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Field United Kingdom 10 232 81 79 76 71 21 430
Aline Ramond‐Roquin France 11 171 0.7× 55 0.7× 102 1.3× 50 0.7× 53 0.7× 38 338
Catherine Young United States 6 265 1.1× 48 0.6× 111 1.4× 61 0.8× 74 1.0× 12 480
Brenda Mullinger United Kingdom 11 219 0.9× 53 0.7× 41 0.5× 22 0.3× 82 1.2× 26 562
Gorjana Radisic Australia 7 127 0.5× 65 0.8× 133 1.7× 35 0.5× 29 0.4× 11 476
Marc‐André Blanchette Canada 9 97 0.4× 27 0.3× 177 2.2× 53 0.7× 68 1.0× 26 414
Y Sittampalam United Kingdom 7 179 0.8× 163 2.0× 78 1.0× 68 0.9× 41 0.6× 9 476
Caitlin R Finley Canada 5 76 0.3× 24 0.3× 66 0.8× 21 0.3× 76 1.1× 8 356
Patricia Zheng United States 15 312 1.3× 248 3.1× 109 1.4× 18 0.2× 141 2.0× 44 635
K. Stevenson United Kingdom 12 159 0.7× 17 0.2× 246 3.1× 40 0.5× 124 1.7× 49 546
Christopher Mercer United States 9 109 0.5× 58 0.7× 41 0.5× 14 0.2× 42 0.6× 20 332

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Field. The network helps show where Jonathan Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Field

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Field. Jonathan Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Bishop, Felicity L., et al.. (2022). Mixed methods systematic review of the literature base exploring working alliance in the chiropractic profession. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 30(1). 35–35. 5 indexed citations
4.
Field, Jonathan, Michelle M. Holmes, & David Newell. (2019). <p>PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review</p>. Patient Related Outcome Measures. Volume 10. 233–241. 107 indexed citations
5.
Kielstein, Jan T., David Czock, Jiao Xie, et al.. (2018). Population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in critically ill patients receiving prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 52(2). 151–157. 24 indexed citations
6.
Holmes, Michelle M., Felicity L. Bishop, David Newell, Jonathan Field, & George Lewith. (2018). Chiropractors’ views on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a qualitative study. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 26(1). 50–50. 9 indexed citations
7.
Field, Jonathan & David Newell. (2016). Clinical Outcomes in a Large Cohort of Musculoskeletal Patients Undergoing Chiropractic Care in the United Kingdom: A Comparison of Self- and National Health Service–Referred Routes. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 39(1). 54–62. 13 indexed citations
8.
Holmes, Michelle M., George Lewith, David Newell, Jonathan Field, & Felicity L. Bishop. (2016). The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review. Quality of Life Research. 26(2). 245–257. 91 indexed citations
9.
Graham, Steve, et al.. (2015). Returning Citizens: A quiet revolution in prisoner reintegration. Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling). 3(1). 32–33. 2 indexed citations
10.
Newell, David, Jonathan Field, & D. F. W. Pollard. (2014). Using the STarT Back Tool: Does timing of stratification matter?. Manual Therapy. 20(4). 533–539. 26 indexed citations
12.
Newell, David, et al.. (2013). Prognostic accuracy of clinicians for back, neck and shoulder patients in routine practice. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 21(1). 42–42. 5 indexed citations
13.
Field, Jonathan & David Newell. (2012). Relationship between STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for low back pain patients receiving spinal manipulative therapy. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 20(1). 17–17. 52 indexed citations
14.
Field, Jonathan, David Newell, & Peter W. McCarthy. (2010). Preliminary study into the components of the fear-avoidance model of LBP: change after an initial chiropractic visit and influence on outcome. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 18(1). 21–21. 14 indexed citations
15.
Roberts, Jason A., et al.. (2010). Using Population Pharmacokinetics To Determine Gentamicin Dosing during Extended Daily Diafiltration in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 54(9). 3635–3640. 43 indexed citations
16.
Field, Jonathan, et al.. (2009). Outcome of severe pancreatitis. Australian Critical Care. 22(1). 48–48. 1 indexed citations
17.
Field, Jonathan. (2008). Exercises and management of lower back pain. Clinical Chiropractic. 11(4). 199–204. 2 indexed citations
18.
Newell, David & Jonathan Field. (2007). Who will get better? Predicting clinical outcomes in a chiropractic practice. Clinical Chiropractic. 10(4). 179–186. 17 indexed citations
19.
Field, Jonathan, et al.. (2003). Building lives through an artistic community. 4 indexed citations
20.
Hunt, Nigel & Jonathan Field. (1999). Continuing professional development: the why, the how and the when. 3(3). 62–64. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026