Jonathan Booth

58 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Jonathan Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Pharmaceutical Science 491
  • Electrochemistry 221
  • Biomaterials 346
  • Bioengineering 116
  • Materials Chemistry 497
Replace M. Noel with:
M. Noel India
Qun Lü China
Iara F. Gimenez Brazil
Alexandra Teleki Switzerland
Min Su China
Shaohua Jin China
Bin Mu United States
Christophe A. Serra France
Huaiyu Yang China
Ting Wang China
Jonathan Booth relative to M. Noel India M. Noel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.9×
M. Noel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Booth. The network helps show where Jonathan Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Booth Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012182
2 1994125
3 2011108
4 200888
5 199768
6 201463
7 201458
8 202153
9 201653
10 199550
11 201849
12 202047
13 201245
14 199745
15 201145
16 201542
17 201637
18 199737
19 201335
20 199532

About Jonathan Booth

Jonathan Booth is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science, Organic Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallization and Solubility Studies (12 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (12 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (9 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (7 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (6 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (5 papers) and Protein purification and stability (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (491 citations), Electrochemistry (221 citations), Biomaterials (346 citations), Bioengineering (116 citations) and Materials Chemistry (497 citations). Jonathan Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Richard G. Compton, Giles H.W. Sanders, Mike Claybourn, Elisabeth Vey, Alberto Saiani, Aline F. Miller, J. Burley, E. J. Meehan, Shu Li and Yiwei Tian. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Pharmaceutics, Polymer Degradation and Stability, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Journal of Controlled Release and International Journal of Pharmaceutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact