Thomas F. Watson

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
27 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Thomas F. Watson is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas F. Watson has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 20 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 10 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Thomas F. Watson's work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (23 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (18 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (8 papers). Thomas F. Watson is often cited by papers focused on Quantum and electron transport phenomena (23 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (18 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (8 papers). Thomas F. Watson collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Thomas F. Watson's co-authors include M. Y. Simmons, Bent Weber, D. E. Savage, M. A. Eriksson, Daniel R. Ward, S. N. Coppersmith, Lieven M. K. Vandersypen, M. G. Lagally, Mark Friesen and Pasquale Scarlino and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Thomas F. Watson

26 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

A programmable two-qubit ... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 100 200 300 400

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Thomas F. Watson 1000 673 492 120 64 27 1.2k
Stephan G. J. Philips 865 0.9× 542 0.8× 483 1.0× 92 0.8× 69 1.1× 10 1.0k
J. C. C. Hwang 1.6k 1.6× 994 1.5× 822 1.7× 131 1.1× 92 1.4× 17 1.8k
Erika Kawakami 935 0.9× 578 0.9× 451 0.9× 83 0.7× 43 0.7× 16 1.1k
M. Fernando González-Zalba 938 0.9× 703 1.0× 444 0.9× 104 0.9× 56 0.9× 57 1.2k
André Saraiva 1.1k 1.1× 741 1.1× 408 0.8× 179 1.5× 37 0.6× 64 1.3k
Maximilian Russ 1.5k 1.5× 790 1.2× 927 1.9× 127 1.1× 108 1.7× 32 1.7k
Jun Yoneda 1.3k 1.3× 762 1.1× 606 1.2× 107 0.9× 73 1.1× 44 1.4k
Lars R. Schreiber 1.0k 1.0× 688 1.0× 420 0.9× 99 0.8× 74 1.2× 46 1.2k
Tetsuo Kodera 1.3k 1.3× 939 1.4× 441 0.9× 198 1.6× 57 0.9× 109 1.5k
William I. L. Lawrie 689 0.7× 398 0.6× 373 0.8× 65 0.5× 48 0.8× 16 794

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas F. Watson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas F. Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas F. Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas F. Watson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas F. Watson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas F. Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas F. Watson. The network helps show where Thomas F. Watson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas F. Watson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas F. Watson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas F. Watson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas F. Watson. Thomas F. Watson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kotlyar, R., Shavindra Premaratne, Guoji Zheng, et al.. (2022). Mitigating Impact of Defects On Performance with Classical Device Engineering of Scaled Si/SiGe Qubit Arrays. 2022 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM). 12. 8.4.1–8.4.4. 1 indexed citations
2.
Watson, Thomas F., Kutub Thakur, & Md Liakat Ali. (2022). The Impact of Purchasing Cyber Insurance on the Enhancement of Operational Cyber Risk Mitigation of U.S. Banks - A Case Study. 709–715. 6 indexed citations
4.
Xue, Xiao, Benjamin D’Anjou, Thomas F. Watson, et al.. (2020). Repetitive Quantum Nondemolition Measurement and Soft Decoding of a Silicon Spin Qubit. Physical Review X. 10(2). 27 indexed citations
5.
Keith, Daniel, et al.. (2019). Single-Shot Spin Readout in Semiconductors Near the Shot-Noise Sensitivity Limit. Physical Review X. 9(4). 44 indexed citations
6.
Weber, Bent, Thomas F. Watson, Ruoyu Li, et al.. (2018). Spin–orbit coupling in silicon for electrons bound to donors. npj Quantum Information. 4(1). 23 indexed citations
7.
Gorman, S. K., Matthew A. Broome, Matthew House, et al.. (2018). Singlet-triplet minus mixing and relaxation lifetimes in a double donor dot. Applied Physics Letters. 112(24). 1 indexed citations
8.
Watson, Thomas F., Stephan G. J. Philips, Erika Kawakami, et al.. (2018). A programmable two-qubit quantum processor in silicon. Nature. 555(7698). 633–637. 454 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Broome, Matthew A., S. K. Gorman, Matthew House, et al.. (2018). Two-electron spin correlations in precision placed donors in silicon. Nature Communications. 9(1). 980–980. 48 indexed citations
10.
Watson, Thomas F., et al.. (2017). Atomically engineered electron spin lifetimes of 30 s in silicon. Science Advances. 3(3). 49 indexed citations
11.
Broome, Matthew A., Thomas F. Watson, Daniel Keith, et al.. (2017). High-Fidelity Single-Shot Singlet-Triplet Readout of Precision-Placed Donors in Silicon. Physical Review Letters. 119(4). 46802–46802. 32 indexed citations
12.
Broome, Matthew A., S. K. Gorman, J. G. Keizer, et al.. (2016). Mapping the chemical potential landscape of a triple quantum dot. Physical review. B.. 94(5). 2 indexed citations
13.
Gorman, S. K., Matthew A. Broome, J. G. Keizer, et al.. (2016). Extracting inter-dot tunnel couplings between few donor quantum dots in silicon. New Journal of Physics. 18(5). 53041–53041. 4 indexed citations
14.
Watson, Thomas F., Bent Weber, Matthew House, Holger Büch, & M. Y. Simmons. (2015). High-Fidelity Rapid Initialization and Read-Out of an Electron Spin via the Single DonorDCharge State. Physical Review Letters. 115(16). 166806–166806. 42 indexed citations
15.
House, Matthew, Takashi Kobayashi, Bent Weber, et al.. (2015). Radio frequency measurements of tunnel couplings and singlet–triplet spin states in Si:P quantum dots. Nature Communications. 6(1). 8848–8848. 50 indexed citations
16.
Weber, Bent, Suddhasatta Mahapatra, Thomas F. Watson, et al.. (2014). Spin blockade and exchange in Coulomb-confined silicon double quantum dots. Nature Nanotechnology. 9(6). 430–435. 107 indexed citations
17.
Weber, Bent, Suddhasatta Mahapatra, Thomas F. Watson, & M. Y. Simmons. (2012). Engineering Independent Electrostatic Control of Atomic-Scale (∼4 nm) Silicon Double Quantum Dots. Nano Letters. 12(8). 4001–4006. 31 indexed citations
18.
Watson, Thomas F., et al.. (2010). The morphology of tin cluster assembled films and the effect of nitrogen. The European Physical Journal D. 61(1). 81–85. 5 indexed citations
19.
Watson, Thomas F.. (2009). Tin Oxide Cluster Assembled Films: Morphology and Gas Sensors. University of Canterbury Research Repository (University of Canterbury). 1 indexed citations
20.
Ahluwalia, Dharam Vir, et al.. (2008). Local fermionic dark matter with mass dimension one. arXiv (Cornell University). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026