Jonas Eimontas

523 citations
24 papers · 277 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jonas Eimontas

20 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

Jonas Eimontas
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Applied Psychology 65
  • Music 23
  • Clinical Psychology 154
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 84
  • Social Psychology 82
Replace Anne I. Roche with:
Anne I. Roche United States
Ana Vilela Mendes Brazil
Matt S. Treeby Australia
Alexandra L. Silverman United States
Kerstin Spanhel Germany
Torgeir Sørensen Norway
Tanya Mikhael United States
Anne-Laure Demarty France
Hanna Reich Germany
Dale Dirkse Canada
Jonas Eimontas relative to Anne I. Roche United States Anne I. Roche's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Anne I. Roche · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonas Eimontas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonas Eimontas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonas Eimontas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonas Eimontas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonas Eimontas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonas Eimontas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonas Eimontas. The network helps show where Jonas Eimontas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonas Eimontas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonas Eimontas Line = papers co-authored together Jonas Eimontas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201855
2 201633
3 201732
4 201825
5 201723
6 201622
7 202218
8 201715
9 202014
10 201410
11 20228
12 20217
13 20175
14 20172
15 20212
16 20142
17 20251
18 20211
19 20151
20 20211

About Jonas Eimontas

Jonas Eimontas is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and Health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (5 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (5 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (4 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (65 citations), Music (23 citations), Clinical Psychology (154 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (84 citations) and Social Psychology (82 citations). Jonas Eimontas has collaborated with scholars based in Lithuania, Sweden and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Evaldas Kazlauskas, Paulina Želvienė, Andreas Maercker, Vilmantė Pakalniškienė, Gerhard Andersson, Miranda Olff, Antanas Kairys, Agostino Brugnera, Andreas Schwerdtfeger and David Gosar. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders, BMC Psychiatry and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact