Jonas De keersmaecker
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Communication top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Co-authors
- Arne RoetsAlain Van HielJasper Van AsscheKristof DhontDries H. BostynEmma OnraetDavid DunningCarmen Sanchez
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (21 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (14 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Partner nations
- BelgiumSpainUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jonas De keersmaecker
28 papers receiving 585 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Sociology and Political Science 455
- Social Psychology 193
- Communication 117
- Cognitive Neuroscience 102
- Artificial Intelligence 92
Countries citing papers authored by Jonas De keersmaecker
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonas De keersmaecker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonas De keersmaecker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonas De keersmaecker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonas De keersmaecker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonas De keersmaecker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonas De keersmaecker. The network helps show where Jonas De keersmaecker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonas De keersmaecker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonas De keersmaecker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonas De keersmaecker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonas De keersmaecker. Jonas De keersmaecker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 89 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 28 | |
| 20 | 34 |
About Jonas De keersmaecker
Jonas De keersmaecker is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Health Informatics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 607 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (21 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (14 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (117 citations), Sociology and Political Science (455 citations) and Social Psychology (193 citations). Jonas De keersmaecker has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Spain and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Arne Roets, Alain Van Hiel, Jasper Van Assche, Kristof Dhont, Dries H. Bostyn, Emma Onraet, David Dunning, Carmen Sanchez, David G. Rand and Gordon Pennycook. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.