Jon Sanford

2.0k citations
86 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Sanford

82 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Jon Sanford
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Occupational Therapy 278
  • Rehabilitation 341
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 101
  • Demography 243
  • Human-Computer Interaction 104
Replace Anabela G. Silva with:
Anabela G. Silva Portugal
Machiko Tomita United States
Pieter Coenen Netherlands
Nancy Gell United States
Nelson Pacheco Rocha Portugal
Nathalie Bier Canada
Joy Hammel United States
Louise Gustafsson Australia
Rosalie H. Wang Canada
Jennifer Boger Canada
Jon Sanford relative to Anabela G. Silva Portugal Anabela G. Silva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Anabela G. Silva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Sanford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Sanford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Sanford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Sanford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Sanford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Sanford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Sanford. The network helps show where Jon Sanford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon Sanford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Sanford Line = papers co-authored together Jon Sanford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 202117
3 201910
4
Universally Designed mHealth App for Individuals Aging with Multiple Sclerosis
20182
5
Design and Evaluation of Mobile Interfaces for an Aging Population
20172
6 20137
7 20132
8 20123
9 201025
10 200832
11 200810
12 200714
13 200690
14 200670
15 200437
16 200411
17 20022
18 199731
19 199654
20 199521

About Jon Sanford

Jon Sanford is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation, Demography, Human-Computer Interaction and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 86 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (31 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (15 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (12 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (11 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (8 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (7 papers), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (6 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (278 citations), Rehabilitation (341 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (101 citations), Demography (243 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (104 citations). Jon Sanford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Helen Hoenig, Patricia Griffiths, Michael L. Jones, Wendy A. Rogers, Miriam C. Morey, Patricia A. Quigley, Neale R. Chumbler, Dorian K. Rose, Bettye Rose Connell and Xinli Li. Their work appears in journals such as Assistive Technology, Innovation in Aging, The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, The Gerontologist and Disability and health journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026