Jennifer Boger
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 2%
- Demography top 0.5%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- Alex MihailidisJesse HoeyShi CaoGeoff FerniePascal PoupartCraig BoutilierPlinio Pelegrini MoritaGeorge Shaker
- Topics
- Technology Use by Older Adults (20 papers)Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (17 papers)Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (16 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jennifer Boger
106 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 550
- Demography 506
- Human-Computer Interaction 382
- Psychiatry and Mental health 375
- Biomedical Engineering 277
Countries citing papers authored by Jennifer Boger
This map shows the geographic impact of Jennifer Boger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jennifer Boger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jennifer Boger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jennifer Boger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jennifer Boger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jennifer Boger. The network helps show where Jennifer Boger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jennifer Boger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jennifer Boger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jennifer Boger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jennifer Boger. Jennifer Boger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Jennifer Boger
Jennifer Boger is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction and Rehabilitation, having authored 113 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Use by Older Adults (20 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (17 papers) and Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (382 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (93 citations) and Occupational Therapy (189 citations). Jennifer Boger has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alex Mihailidis, Jesse Hoey, Shi Cao, Geoff Fernie, Pascal Poupart, Craig Boutilier, Plinio Pelegrini Morita, George Shaker, Debbie Hébert and Hajar Abedi. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.