Johnathan A. Engh
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Amin KassamCameron N. RiviereIan F. PollackArlan MintzDavneet MinhasTakahiro KunisadaToru IwamaRon McKay
- Journals
- Neurosurgery (25 papers)International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (5 papers)Journal of neurosurgery (5 papers)World Neurosurgery (4 papers)Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Johnathan A. Engh
81 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Genetics 797
- Neurology 559
- Oncology 804
- Immunology 581
- Cancer Research 375
Countries citing papers authored by Johnathan A. Engh
This map shows the geographic impact of Johnathan A. Engh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johnathan A. Engh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johnathan A. Engh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Johnathan A. Engh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johnathan A. Engh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johnathan A. Engh. The network helps show where Johnathan A. Engh may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johnathan A. Engh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 133 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 83 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 45 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 27 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 166 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 17 | Hypoxia promotes expansion of the CD133-positive glioma stem cells through activation of HIF-1α Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 533 |
| 18 | 2007 | 135 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 24 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 13 |
About Johnathan A. Engh
Johnathan A. Engh is a scholar working on Genetics, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 83 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (33 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (17 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (14 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (10 papers), Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (9 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (6 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (6 papers) and Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (797 citations), Neurology (559 citations), Oncology (804 citations), Immunology (581 citations) and Cancer Research (375 citations). Johnathan A. Engh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Amin Kassam, Cameron N. Riviere, Ian F. Pollack, Arlan Mintz, Davneet Minhas, Takahiro Kunisada, Toru Iwama, Ron McKay, Akio Soeda and Andreas Androutsellis‐Theotokis. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Journal of neurosurgery, World Neurosurgery and Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.