John Zelcer

25 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers

John Zelcer
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Health Informatics 49
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 97
  • Developmental Neuroscience 30
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 70
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 22
Replace Aman Mahajan with:
Aman Mahajan United States
Karla C. Maita United States
Mohamad Wehbe Canada
Dmitriy Viderman Kazakhstan
Sadia Khan United Kingdom
Julian Rössler Switzerland
Vanita Ahuja India
Craig A. Williamson United States
Margaret Hopwood United States
Yerkin G. Abdildin Kazakhstan
John Zelcer relative to Aman Mahajan United States Aman Mahajan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×35×
Aman Mahajan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Zelcer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Zelcer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Zelcer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Zelcer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Zelcer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Zelcer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Zelcer. The network helps show where John Zelcer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside John Zelcer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Zelcer Line = papers co-authored together John Zelcer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202257
2 198756
3 202149
4 198835
5 199234
6 202227
7 198826
8 198918
9 202312
10 202412
11 198810
12 19767
13 19886
14 19876
15 19936
16 20233
17
Clinical information systems and quality of care in the intensive care unit.
19953
18 20223
19 19922
20 19922

About John Zelcer

John Zelcer is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 25 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (4 papers), Digital Transformation in Industry (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (3 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (2 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (49 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (97 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (30 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (70 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (22 citations). John Zelcer has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Douglas G. Wells, Nilmini Wickramasinghe, Stephen Vaughan, Prem Prakash Jayaraman, Abdur Rahim Mohammad Forkan, Nalika Ulapane, John Paull, Chinedu I. Ossai, Jay B. Brodsky and Paul F. White. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, IEEE Internet Computing and Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact