John Williams

103 total papers · 1.2k total citations
26 papers, 711 citations indexed

About

John Williams is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, John Williams has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 711 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in John Williams's work include Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers) and Theater, Performance, and Music History (2 papers). John Williams is often cited by papers focused on Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers) and Theater, Performance, and Music History (2 papers). John Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. John Williams's co-authors include Daniel J. Stech, Lowell A. King, R. L. Vaughn, J. Steven Landers, Armand A. Fannin, Bernard J. Piersma, John S. Wilkes, Cheryl Brown, Colin Haslam and A. Claire Cutler and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, The Journal of Physical Chemistry and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

John Williams

19 papers receiving 603 citations

Hit Papers

Properties of 1,3-dialkyl... 1984 2026 1998 2012 1984 100 200 300 400

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
John Williams 327 108 102 88 85 26 711
David A. H. Wilson 441 1.3× 89 0.8× 130 1.3× 113 1.3× 115 1.4× 14 642
Qi Hao 258 0.8× 270 2.5× 194 1.9× 29 0.3× 44 0.5× 34 769
Christopher T. Burns 63 0.2× 92 0.9× 49 0.5× 16 0.2× 302 3.6× 30 850
Jennifer A. Rudd 176 0.5× 253 2.3× 172 1.7× 51 0.6× 44 0.5× 30 788
Frank Miller 24 0.1× 138 1.3× 234 2.3× 322 3.7× 84 1.0× 47 757
Christoph Michels 102 0.3× 13 0.1× 23 0.2× 14 0.2× 30 0.4× 14 812
Dave Russell 133 0.4× 107 1.0× 16 0.2× 3 0.0× 38 0.4× 34 770
Huiping Zhang 89 0.3× 326 3.0× 30 0.3× 16 0.2× 77 0.9× 37 785
Thierry Meyer 43 0.1× 107 1.0× 49 0.5× 11 0.1× 67 0.8× 55 821
Hyo Kim 118 0.4× 176 1.6× 38 0.4× 2 0.0× 26 0.3× 44 785

Countries citing papers authored by John Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Williams. The network helps show where John Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Williams. John Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026