John W. Scanlon

3.3k citations
102 papers · 2.5k indexed · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

John W. Scanlon

97 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

John W. Scanlon
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 306
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 773
  • Developmental Neuroscience 137
  • Pharmacy 135
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 117
Replace Virginia Apgar with:
Virginia Apgar United States
Hans Ulrich Bucher Switzerland
K. W. Cross United Kingdom
Donald C. Martin United States
Ole Pryds Denmark
Thomas Hegyi United States
Bernhard Roth Germany
Simon J Mitchell New Zealand
Joan E. Hodgman United States
Victor Chernick Canada
John W. Scanlon relative to Virginia Apgar United States Virginia Apgar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Virginia Apgar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Scanlon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Scanlon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Scanlon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Scanlon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Scanlon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Scanlon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Scanlon. The network helps show where John W. Scanlon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John W. Scanlon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Scanlon Line = papers co-authored together John W. Scanlon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202211
2 200625
3 199786
4 1994241
5 19917
6 199110
7 1989125
8 198815
9 19842
10
Code pink : a practical system for neonatal/perinatal resuscitation
19811
11 198124
12 19815
13 198044
14 19796
15 19788
16 197646
17 197674
18 197416
19 19739
20 197127

About John W. Scanlon

John W. Scanlon is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Pharmacy, having authored 102 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (27 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (14 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (12 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (11 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (8 papers), Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (8 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers) and Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (306 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (773 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (137 citations), Pharmacy (135 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (117 citations). John W. Scanlon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Lee A. Segel, Kathleen B. Scanlon, Lawrence Grylack, Milton H. Alper, Walter U. Brown, Jess B. Weiss, Rachel M. Schwartz, Paul Hamosh, Margit Hamosh and Stephen W. Porges. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Pediatrics, PEDIATRICS, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatric Research and Child Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026