Stephen Wroe
- Paleontology top 0.1%
- Evolution and Paleontology Studies 89
- Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology 39
- Anthropology top 0.2%
- Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology 32
- Geometry and Topology top 0.5%
- Morphological variations and asymmetry 28
-
- Ichthyology and Marine Biology 23
- Ecology top 1%
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 27
-
- Bat Biology and Ecology Studies 25
-
- Primate Behavior and Ecology 17
- Co-authors
- Colin R. McHenryPhilip ClausenJudith FieldPer ChristiansenKaren MorenoNick MilneJeffrey J. ThomasonUphar Chamoli
- Journals
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (16 papers)PLoS ONE (13 papers)Alcheringa An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen Wroe
134 papers receiving 5.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Paleontology 3.8k
- Anthropology 1.2k
- Geometry and Topology 1.1k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 871
- Ecology 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Wroe
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Wroe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Wroe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Wroe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Wroe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Wroe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Wroe. The network helps show where Stephen Wroe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Wroe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 43 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 37 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 68 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 77 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 40 | |
| 19 | Additional material of Dasyurus dunmalli from the Pliocene Chinchilla Local Fauna of Queensland and its phylogenetic implications | 2000 | 4 |
| 20 | 2000 | 73 |
About Stephen Wroe
Stephen Wroe is a scholar working on Paleontology, Anthropology and Geometry and Topology, having authored 135 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Paleontology Studies (89 papers), Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology (39 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (32 papers), Morphological variations and asymmetry (28 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (27 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (25 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (23 papers) and Primate Behavior and Ecology (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (3.8k citations), Anthropology (1.2k citations) and Geometry and Topology (1.1k citations). Stephen Wroe has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Colin R. McHenry, Philip Clausen, Judith Field, Per Christiansen, Karen Moreno, Nick Milne, Jeffrey J. Thomason, Uphar Chamoli, William C. Parr and Anjali Goswami. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, PLoS ONE, Alcheringa An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology, Australian Journal of Zoology and Journal of Biomechanics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.