John W. Lewis

24 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power c...19882026200020131988200400600

Peers

John W. Lewis
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Ophthalmology 662
  • Epidemiology 643
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 630
  • Strategy and Management 201
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 200
Replace John S. Ambler with:
John S. Ambler United States
C Kurz United States
Kerry Smith United States
Tai Gyu Kim South Korea
Ashkan Khalili United Kingdom
H. Mandl Austria
Sachiko Takeda United Kingdom
Ian Towers Germany
Catherine P. Slade United States
John Dunn United Kingdom
John W. Lewis relative to John S. Ambler United States John S. Ambler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.5×
John S. Ambler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Lewis. The network helps show where John W. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John W. Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John W. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John W. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John W. Lewis. John W. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Pilot Study of a Dynamic Binocular Photoscreening Device
0
2
Review U.S. policy toward North Korea
2
3 1
4
THAAD Radar: Examination of a Cost Saving Initiative.
0
5 1
6 35
7
Military Readiness and the Training of China's Sailors
1
8 22
9
A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculationsbreakdown →
660
10 10
11 7
12 37
13 1
14 4
15 1
16
Bertrand Russell: philosopher and humanist
1
17 1
18 3
19 5
20 5

About John W. Lewis

John W. Lewis is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Transportation and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (5 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (662 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (630 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (200 citations). John W. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anthony F. Buono, James L. Bowditch, Jack T. Holladay, Richard S. Ruiz, Thomas C. Prager, Xue Litai, Donald S. Zagoria, Betsy Wackernagel Bach, Charles J. Koester and Keith Bourgeois. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, Foreign Affairs and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026