John W. Harbell
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Immunology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Rodger D. CurrenJohn M. BaustLia H. CampbellRaymond W. NimsHans RaabePatrick HaydenKaren J. CooperL.K. Earl
- Topics
- Animal testing and alternatives (25 papers)Immunotoxicology and immune responses (9 papers)3D Printing in Biomedical Research (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
John W. Harbell
48 papers receiving 889 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Small Animals 413
- Molecular Biology 223
- Biomedical Engineering 182
- Immunology 179
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 82
Countries citing papers authored by John W. Harbell
This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Harbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Harbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Harbell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Harbell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Harbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Harbell. The network helps show where John W. Harbell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John W. Harbell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John W. Harbell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John W. Harbell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John W. Harbell. John W. Harbell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 37 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | The importance of supplier qualification for vendors of materials used in in vitro assays | 1 |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 113 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 46 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 45 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | Genetic Toxicity Assessment of Chloropentafluorobenzene | 1 |
| 20 | 14 |
About John W. Harbell
John W. Harbell is a scholar working on Small Animals, Immunology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 48 papers that have together received 965 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal testing and alternatives (25 papers), Immunotoxicology and immune responses (9 papers) and 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (413 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (9 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (81 citations). John W. Harbell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rodger D. Curren, John M. Baust, Lia H. Campbell, Raymond W. Nims, Hans Raabe, Patrick Hayden, Karen J. Cooper, L.K. Earl, Johannes J.M. van de Sandt and R. Roguet. Their work appears in journals such as JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Cancer and Environmental Health Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.