Julia Scheel

1.3k total citations
39 papers, 816 citations indexed

About

Julia Scheel is a scholar working on Small Animals, Molecular Biology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Scheel has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 816 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Small Animals, 10 papers in Molecular Biology and 7 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. Recurrent topics in Julia Scheel's work include Animal testing and alternatives (9 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (6 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (5 papers). Julia Scheel is often cited by papers focused on Animal testing and alternatives (9 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (6 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (5 papers). Julia Scheel collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Denmark. Julia Scheel's co-authors include Kerstin Reisinger, Nicola J. Hewitt, Carsten Goebel, Annette Mehling, Florian Schellauf, Daisuke Araki, Jalila Hibatallah, Matthias Krauledat, Matthias Redenbach and Eric K. Dufour and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Toxicological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Julia Scheel

38 papers receiving 761 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julia Scheel Germany 19 195 177 158 145 143 39 816
Hajime Kojima Japan 17 180 0.9× 344 1.9× 124 0.8× 200 1.4× 164 1.1× 78 966
John W. Harbell United States 19 223 1.1× 413 2.3× 64 0.4× 81 0.6× 182 1.3× 48 965
Andreas Schepky Germany 18 77 0.4× 286 1.6× 131 0.8× 206 1.4× 93 0.7× 43 941
Esther de Jong Netherlands 12 244 1.3× 64 0.4× 35 0.2× 140 1.0× 49 0.3× 19 777
R. Roguet France 21 178 0.9× 512 2.9× 87 0.6× 164 1.1× 188 1.3× 46 1.5k
Marie M. Riddle United States 20 242 1.2× 116 0.7× 60 0.4× 428 3.0× 39 0.3× 48 1.1k
Jorge Colaço Portugal 14 215 1.1× 131 0.7× 112 0.7× 47 0.3× 151 1.1× 22 1000
Kyoko Sakamoto Japan 14 279 1.4× 27 0.2× 52 0.3× 74 0.5× 32 0.2× 33 757
Graham R. Elliott Netherlands 16 181 0.9× 151 0.9× 34 0.2× 54 0.4× 44 0.3× 51 769
Karsten Mewes Germany 15 72 0.4× 254 1.4× 53 0.3× 64 0.4× 109 0.8× 32 673

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Scheel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Scheel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Scheel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Scheel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Scheel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Scheel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Scheel. The network helps show where Julia Scheel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Scheel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Scheel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Scheel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Scheel. Julia Scheel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Landsiedel, Robert, Barbara Birk, Eric Fabian, et al.. (2024). The Use of Toxicokinetic Information for Setting Concentrations of In Vitro Toxicity Tests and for Interpreting Their Results: A Proposed Workflow. 10(1). 15–26. 2 indexed citations
2.
Scheel, Julia, et al.. (2023). A proteomic profile of the healthy human placenta. Clinical Proteomics. 20(1). 1–1. 9 indexed citations
3.
Hahn, Olga, Georg Fuellen, Markus Wolfien, et al.. (2020). TGF-ß1 Induces Changes in the Energy Metabolism of White Adipose Tissue-Derived Human Adult Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells In Vitro. Metabolites. 10(2). 59–59. 7 indexed citations
4.
Piersma, Aldert H., Robert Landsiedel, Rebecca A. Clewell, et al.. (2019). Workshop on the validation and regulatory acceptance of innovative 3R approaches in regulatory toxicology – Evolution versus revolution. Toxicology in Vitro. 59. 1–11. 29 indexed citations
5.
Schwarz, Katharina, et al.. (2017). A methodology for the assessment of inhalation exposure to aluminium from antiperspirant sprays. Archives of Toxicology. 92(4). 1383–1392. 3 indexed citations
6.
Hewitt, Nicola J., Robert J. Edwards, Ellen Fritsche, et al.. (2013). Use of Human In Vitro Skin Models for Accurate and Ethical Risk Assessment: Metabolic Considerations. Toxicological Sciences. 133(2). 209–217. 76 indexed citations
7.
Scheel, Julia, et al.. (2012). Risk assessment of amorphous silicon dioxide nanoparticles in a glass cleaner formulation. Nanotoxicology. 7(5). 974–988. 17 indexed citations
9.
Scheel, Julia, et al.. (2010). Integrated risk assessment of a hydroxyapatite–protein-composite for use in oral care products: A weight-of-evidence case study. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 59(2). 310–323. 18 indexed citations
10.
Pfuhler, Stefan, Marilyn J. Aardema, Carsten Goebel, et al.. (2010). A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: Genotoxicity. A COLIPA analysis. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 57(2-3). 315–324. 56 indexed citations
11.
Seidle, Troy, Sally Robinson, Tom Holmes, et al.. (2010). Cross-Sector Review of Drivers and Available 3Rs Approaches for Acute Systemic Toxicity Testing. Toxicological Sciences. 116(2). 382–396. 36 indexed citations
13.
McNamee, Pauline, Jalila Hibatallah, Carsten Goebel, et al.. (2009). A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: Eye irritation. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 54(2). 197–209. 69 indexed citations
14.
Jones, Penny, Carsten Goebel, Eric K. Dufour, et al.. (2009). A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: Skin irritation. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 54(2). 188–196. 23 indexed citations
16.
Albrecht, Catrin, Agnes M. Scherbart, Damiën van Berlo, et al.. (2009). Evaluation of cytotoxic effects and oxidative stress with hydroxyapatite dispersions of different physicochemical properties in rat NR8383 cells and primary macrophages. Toxicology in Vitro. 23(3). 520–530. 44 indexed citations
17.
Scheel, Julia, et al.. (2008). The hen's egg test for micronucleus induction (HET-MN): Novel analyses with a series of well-characterized substances support the further evaluation of the test system. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 650(2). 150–164. 28 indexed citations
18.
Redenbach, Matthias, Julia Scheel, & Ulrike Schmidt. (2000). Chromosome topology and genome size of selected actinomycetes species. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 78(3-4). 227–235. 27 indexed citations
19.
Scheel, Julia, et al.. (2000). Genomic structure of the human Ah receptor nuclear translocator gene ( hARNT ). Human Genetics. 107(4). 397–399. 3 indexed citations
20.
Scheel, Julia, et al.. (1971). Chromosome numbers of fishes. I. Journal of Fish Biology. 3(4). 479–486. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026