Juliette M. Mott
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Lisa S. ElwoodTara E. GalovskiEllen J. TengNatalie E. HundtJeffrey A. CullyJeffrey M. LohrTimothy T. HouleLeah M. Blain
- Topics
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (17 papers)Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyClinical Psychology Review
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Juliette M. Mott
26 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Clinical Psychology 878
- General Health Professions 319
- Epidemiology 249
- Social Psychology 236
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 64
Countries citing papers authored by Juliette M. Mott
This map shows the geographic impact of Juliette M. Mott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juliette M. Mott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juliette M. Mott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Juliette M. Mott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juliette M. Mott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juliette M. Mott. The network helps show where Juliette M. Mott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Juliette M. Mott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Juliette M. Mott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Juliette M. Mott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Juliette M. Mott. Juliette M. Mott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 51 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 87 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 122 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 212 | |
| 14 | 55 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 71 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 156 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About Juliette M. Mott
Juliette M. Mott is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Leadership and Management and General Health Professions, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (17 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (878 citations), General Health Professions (319 citations) and Social Psychology (236 citations). Juliette M. Mott has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lisa S. Elwood, Tara E. Galovski, Ellen J. Teng, Natalie E. Hundt, Jeffrey A. Cully, Jeffrey M. Lohr, Timothy T. Houle, Leah M. Blain, Rebecca Hofstein Grady and Melinda A. Stanley. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Clinical Psychology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.