John V. Bowler
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Neurology top 2%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Philip B. GorelickVladimir HachinskiLeonardo PantoniKenneth RockwoodJohn T. O’BrienSerge GauthierBarry ReisbergClive Ballard
- Topics
- Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (16 papers)Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (16 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
John V. Bowler
39 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
- Neurology 944
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 727
- Neurology 630
- Epidemiology 508
Countries citing papers authored by John V. Bowler
This map shows the geographic impact of John V. Bowler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John V. Bowler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John V. Bowler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John V. Bowler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John V. Bowler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John V. Bowler. The network helps show where John V. Bowler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John V. Bowler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John V. Bowler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John V. Bowler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John V. Bowler. John V. Bowler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 71 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | Vascular cognitive impairment : preventable dementia | 37 |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | Vascular cognitive impairmentbreakdown → | 857 |
| 9 | 54 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 100 | |
| 15 | 106 | |
| 16 | 210 | |
| 17 | 28 | |
| 18 | 61 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About John V. Bowler
John V. Bowler is a scholar working on Neurology, Neurology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 40 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (16 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (16 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (944 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.1k citations) and Neurology (630 citations). John V. Bowler has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip B. Gorelick, Vladimir Hachinski, Leonardo Pantoni, Kenneth Rockwood, John T. O’Brien, Serge Gauthier, Barry Reisberg, Clive Ballard, Steven T. DeKosky and Gustavo C. Román. Their work appears in journals such as Stroke, The Lancet Neurology and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.