Neil Pinney

569 total citations
10 papers, 355 citations indexed

About

Neil Pinney is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Neil Pinney has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 355 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 4 papers in Strategy and Management and 3 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Neil Pinney's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (9 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (4 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers). Neil Pinney is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (9 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (4 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers). Neil Pinney collaborates with scholars based in United States. Neil Pinney's co-authors include John T. Scholz, Kathleen M. McGraw, D. Neumann and Albert D. Cover and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Political Science, Social Cognition and Political Research Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Neil Pinney

10 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Neil Pinney United States	6	135	123	121	75	66	10	355
Keith Schnakenberg United States	9	207 1.5×	73 0.6×	278 2.3×	106 1.4×	25 0.4×	26	467
J. Scott Matthews Canada	11	288 2.1×	72 0.6×	160 1.3×	48 0.6×	45 0.7×	31	443
Frank J. Macchiarola United States	8	76 0.6×	55 0.4×	102 0.8×	47 0.6×	9 0.1×	26	310
André Kaiser Germany	15	578 4.3×	78 0.6×	143 1.2×	165 2.2×	47 0.7×	46	685
José Fernández-Albertos Spain	11	315 2.3×	156 1.3×	123 1.0×	44 0.6×	21 0.3×	32	512
Sten Widmalm Sweden	11	134 1.0×	182 1.5×	161 1.3×	19 0.3×	19 0.3×	38	424
Quinton Mayne United States	8	258 1.9×	50 0.4×	265 2.2×	31 0.4×	101 1.5×	14	456
Ari Adut United States	6	68 0.5×	16 0.1×	190 1.6×	59 0.8×	60 0.9×	13	324
Nick Robinson United Kingdom	14	130 1.0×	54 0.4×	234 1.9×	34 0.5×	54 0.8×	54	437
Robert L. Peabody United States	11	202 1.5×	65 0.5×	116 1.0×	64 0.9×	25 0.4×	30	397

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Pinney

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Pinney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Pinney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Pinney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Pinney

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Pinney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Pinney. The network helps show where Neil Pinney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil Pinney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil Pinney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil Pinney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil Pinney. Neil Pinney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Pinney, Neil, et al.. (2004). Casework, issues and voting in state legislative elections: a district analysis. Journal of Legislative Studies. 10(4). 32–46. 8 indexed citations

2.

Pinney, Neil, et al.. (2004). The Costs of Reform. Party Politics. 10(1). 69–84. 3 indexed citations

3.

Pinney, Neil, et al.. (2002). A Voice for Black Interests: Congressional Black Caucus Cohesion and Bill Cosponsorship. Congress & the Presidency. 29(1). 69–86. 4 indexed citations

4.

Pinney, Neil, et al.. (1999). The Congressional Black Caucus and Vote Cohesion: Placing the Caucus within House Voting Patterns. Political Research Quarterly. 52(3). 583–583. 2 indexed citations

5.

Pinney, Neil, et al.. (1999). The Congressional Black Caucus and Vote Cohesion:Placing the Caucus Within House Voting Patterns. Political Research Quarterly. 52(3). 583–607. 16 indexed citations

6.

Cover, Albert D., et al.. (1997). Voting Behavior in the US House and Senate. Party Politics. 3(2). 221–241. 5 indexed citations

7.

Cover, Albert D., et al.. (1997). Ideological cohesion between congress and the president: Does the road to the white house matter?. Journal of Legislative Studies. 3(2). 50–69. 2 indexed citations

8.

Scholz, John T. & Neil Pinney. (1995). Duty, Fear, and Tax Compliance: The Heuristic Basis of Citizenship Behavior. American Journal of Political Science. 39(2). 490–490. 203 indexed citations

9.

McGraw, Kathleen M., Neil Pinney, & D. Neumann. (1991). Memory for political actors: Contrasting the use of semantic and evaluative organizational strategies. Political Behavior. 13(2). 165–189. 17 indexed citations

10.

McGraw, Kathleen M. & Neil Pinney. (1990). The Effects of General and Domain-Specific Expertise on Political Memory and Judgment. Social Cognition. 8(1). 9–30. 95 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact