John Slof

669 citations
34 papers · 493 · h-index 12

Impact in

  • Genetics top 10%
    • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Accounting top 10%
    • Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
    • Corporate Finance and Governance

Papers in

John Slof

31 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

John Slof
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Genetics 139
  • Accounting 108
  • Strategy and Management 86
  • Management Information Systems 41
  • Neurology 54
Replace Christophe Bonnet with:
Christophe Bonnet Belgium
Suyun Chen China
Michael J. Petersen United States
Luca Persico Italy
Hyunsuk Peter Suh South Korea
Volker Zimmermann Germany
Patrick J. Kelly Australia
Vincenzo Farina Italy
Thijs Jansen Netherlands
Won Seok Lee South Korea
John Slof relative to Christophe Bonnet Belgium Christophe Bonnet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Christophe Bonnet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Slof

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Slof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Slof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Slof more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Slof

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Slof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Slof. The network helps show where John Slof may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Slof, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Slof Line = papers co-authored together John Slof links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200180
2 201349
3 201449
4 200343
5 201534
6 201432
7 201132
8 201425
9 201224
10 200017
11 201712
12 200811
13 202211
14 201511
15 20238
16 20128
17 20167
18 19996
19
[Management costs of chest and CNS-related adverse events associated with the treatment of acute migraine attacks with oral triptans].
20054
20 20014

About John Slof

John Slof is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology and Surgery, having authored 34 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (4 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (4 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (3 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (3 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (139 citations), Accounting (108 citations), Strategy and Management (86 citations), Management Information Systems (41 citations) and Neurology (54 citations). John Slof has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Palestinian Territory and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Josep M. Argilés, Jordi Galván, Ricardo Díez Valle, Josep María Argilés-Bosch, Camila Arza, Margarita Torrent, Carlos Vila, Khaldoon Albitar, Aída Ribera and Bruno García del Blanco. Their work appears in journals such as European Accounting Review, Value in Health, Journal of Medical Economics, PLoS ONE and The European Journal of Health Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact