John Scullion

43 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

John Scullion
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Soil Science 464
  • Pollution 244
  • Environmental Chemistry 157
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 182
  • Ecology 372
Replace Clare Cameron with:
Clare Cameron United Kingdom
Jarosław Lasota Poland
Ibone Amézaga Spain
Rauni Strömmer Finland
Josef H. Görres United States
Benjamı́n Viñegla Spain
Robert Lensi France
Victor P. Claassen United States
Graham P. Sparling New Zealand
D. Zabowski United States
John Scullion relative to Clare Cameron United Kingdom Clare Cameron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Clare Cameron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Scullion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Scullion's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Scullion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Scullion more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Scullion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Scullion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Scullion. The network helps show where John Scullion may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Scullion, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Scullion Line = papers co-authored together John Scullion links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000111
2 2000104
3 2002100
4 200692
5 198268
6 200658
7 201648
8 199844
9 198344
10 200242
11 201241
12 201532
13 200332
14 200731
15 199925
16 198023
17 201823
18 198816
19 202016
20 202015

About John Scullion

John Scullion is a scholar working on Soil Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (22 papers), Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology (11 papers), Heavy metals in environment (4 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (4 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (4 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (3 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (3 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (464 citations), Pollution (244 citations), Environmental Chemistry (157 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (182 citations) and Ecology (372 citations). John Scullion has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Masil Khan, Ashish A. Malik, R. W. Edwards, Dylan Gwynn‐Jones, N. C. Morgan, Lois Philipps, George Gardner Brown, J. P. Curry, Geoff Baker and M. W. Humphreys. Their work appears in journals such as Soil Use and Management, Pedobiologia, Biology and Fertility of Soils, Applied Soil Ecology and Ecological Indicators.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact