John S. Ahlquist

37 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

John S. Ahlquist
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Public Administration 141
  • Development 99
  • Political Science and International Relations 455
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 154
  • Strategy and Management 240
Replace Daniel Gingerich with:
Daniel Gingerich United States
Nina Bandelj United States
Frances Rosenbluth United States
Ronald Wintrobe Canada
Suzanne Berger United States
Sarah A. Binder United States
Brandice Canes‐Wrone United States
Gordon White United Kingdom
José María Maravall United States
Susan L. Shirk United States
John S. Ahlquist relative to Daniel Gingerich United States Daniel Gingerich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Daniel Gingerich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John S. Ahlquist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John S. Ahlquist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John S. Ahlquist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John S. Ahlquist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John S. Ahlquist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John S. Ahlquist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John S. Ahlquist. The network helps show where John S. Ahlquist may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside John S. Ahlquist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John S. Ahlquist Line = papers co-authored together John S. Ahlquist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006150
2 2011121
3 2017113
4 201382
5 201176
6 201164
7 202061
8 201251
9 201450
10 201743
11 200940
12 201438
13 201836
14 201732
15 201831
16 202027
17 201022
18 201021
19 200819
20 201818

About John S. Ahlquist

John S. Ahlquist is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Public Administration and Strategy and Management, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (15 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (9 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (4 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (4 papers), International Development and Aid (4 papers), Media Influence and Politics (3 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (141 citations), Development (99 citations), Political Science and International Relations (455 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (154 citations) and Strategy and Management (240 citations). John S. Ahlquist has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Levi, Erik Wibbels, Michael D. Ward, Christian Breunig, Aseem Prakash, Arturas Rozenas, Mark Gandrud Copelovitch, Stefanie Walter, Ben W. Ansell and Amanda Clayton. Their work appears in journals such as Political Analysis, Comparative Political Studies, International Studies Quarterly, Annual Review of Political Science and American Journal of Political Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact