John Reader

2.1k total citations
73 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

John Reader is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, John Reader has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Molecular Biology, 15 papers in Organic Chemistry and 14 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in John Reader's work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (10 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (6 papers) and Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (6 papers). John Reader is often cited by papers focused on Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (10 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (6 papers) and Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (6 papers). John Reader collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Austria. John Reader's co-authors include Michael Ohlmeyer, Lawrence W. Dillard, Michael Wigler, R. N. Swanson, W. Clark Still, Donald C. Craig, Mark Bradley, Butrus Atrash, Maggi Savin‐Baden and G. Wynne Aherne and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and Clinical Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

John Reader

60 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Reader United Kingdom 20 639 397 147 121 85 73 1.2k
James R. Cox United States 20 436 0.7× 352 0.9× 47 0.3× 16 0.1× 119 1.4× 50 1.7k
Michael J. Behe United States 22 1.6k 2.6× 72 0.2× 106 0.7× 29 0.2× 155 1.8× 60 2.2k
Frédéric Lawrence Holmes United States 23 201 0.3× 228 0.6× 279 1.9× 38 0.3× 59 0.7× 81 1.4k
David C. Luther United States 22 1.0k 1.6× 255 0.6× 87 0.6× 52 0.4× 68 0.8× 38 1.9k
Robert M. Martin Portugal 16 1.2k 1.8× 47 0.1× 69 0.5× 32 0.3× 38 0.4× 53 1.8k
Brian McGuinness United States 20 316 0.5× 120 0.3× 91 0.6× 47 0.4× 50 0.6× 65 1.4k
Thomas Blom Sweden 17 708 1.1× 80 0.2× 83 0.6× 48 0.4× 106 1.2× 41 1.7k
Michel S. Laguerre France 27 1.6k 2.4× 573 1.4× 94 0.6× 32 0.3× 283 3.3× 110 2.7k
Alan Richardson United Kingdom 31 1.6k 2.5× 81 0.2× 320 2.2× 128 1.1× 141 1.7× 130 3.6k
Leon Wofsy United States 21 799 1.3× 110 0.3× 75 0.5× 390 3.2× 69 0.8× 44 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by John Reader

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Reader's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Reader with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Reader more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Reader

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Reader. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Reader. The network helps show where John Reader may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Reader

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Reader. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Reader based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Reader. John Reader is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Coeckelbergh, Mark & John Reader. (2023). Searching for the Good Life: Boundary Crossing, Co-Existence, and Conviviality. Postdigital Science and Education. 5(3). 945–957. 2 indexed citations
2.
Reader, John, et al.. (2019). Ethics After New Materialism: A Modest Undertaking. Pure (Coventry University). 2 indexed citations
3.
Reader, John, et al.. (2018). ‘Creating an Ecological Citizenship’: Philosophical and Theological Perspectives on The Role of Contemporary Environmental Education. The Heythrop Journal. 59(6). 997–1008. 5 indexed citations
4.
Reader, John. (2017). Theology and New Materialism. 13 indexed citations
5.
Reader, John. (2015). Out of the Depths: Engineering, Submersibles and Assemblages. 4. 35–42. 1 indexed citations
6.
Walton, Mike I., Paul D. Eve, Angela Hayes, et al.. (2012). CCT244747 Is a Novel Potent and Selective CHK1 Inhibitor with Oral Efficacy Alone and in Combination with Genotoxic Anticancer Drugs. Clinical Cancer Research. 18(20). 5650–5661. 69 indexed citations
7.
Baker, Chris, et al.. (2011). Christianity and the New Social Order: A Manifesto For A Fairer Future. University of Chester's Online Research Repository (University of Chester). 1 indexed citations
8.
Walton, Michael I., Paul D. Eve, Angela Hayes, et al.. (2010). The Preclinical Pharmacology and Therapeutic Activity of the Novel CHK1 Inhibitor SAR-020106. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 9(1). 89–100. 63 indexed citations
9.
Matthews, Thomas P., Tatiana McHardy, Kathy Boxall, et al.. (2010). Design and evaluation of 3,6-di(hetero)aryl imidazo[1,2-a]pyrazines as inhibitors of checkpoint and other kinases. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 20(14). 4045–4049. 20 indexed citations
10.
Matthews, Thomas P., Kathy Boxall, Martin Fisher, et al.. (2009). Identification of Inhibitors of Checkpoint Kinase 1 through Template Screening. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 52(15). 4810–4819. 35 indexed citations
11.
Reader, John, et al.. (2006). 1 Finding Protein Kinase Hits using Structural Information. Progress in medicinal chemistry. 44. 1–63. 2 indexed citations
12.
Rokosz, Laura L., John Reader, Tara M. Stauffer, et al.. (2006). Exploring Structure-Activity Relationships of Tricyclic Farnesyltransferase Inhibitors Using ECLiPS® Libraries. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening. 9(7). 545–558. 2 indexed citations
13.
Kerber, F., Don J. Lindler, Paul Bristow, et al.. (2005). Ageing of Spectral Lamps in Space. 39. 4. 1 indexed citations
14.
Stauffer, Tara M., Corey L. Strickland, John Reader, et al.. (2005). Guiding farnesyltransferase inhibitors from an ECLiPS® library to the catalytic zinc. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 16(3). 507–511. 6 indexed citations
15.
Rokosz, Laura L., John Reader, Tara M. Stauffer, et al.. (2005). Surfing the piperazine core of tricyclic farnesyltransferase inhibitors. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 15(24). 5537–5543. 28 indexed citations
16.
Reader, John. (2004). Automation in Medicinal Chemistry. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 4(7). 671–686. 39 indexed citations
17.
Reader, John. (1998). A case of mistaken identity: an alternative post-modernity. Contact. 127(1). 24–29. 1 indexed citations
18.
Craig, Donald C., et al.. (1996). Intramolecular Diels-Alder reactions of trienes tethered with an ether linkage. Tetrahedron. 52(2). 695–724. 9 indexed citations
19.
Baldwin, John J., Jonathan J. Burbaum, Daniel Chelsky, et al.. (1995). Combinatorial Libraries Encoded with Electrophoric Tags. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 30. 349s–358s. 4 indexed citations
20.
Craig, Donald C. & John Reader. (1990). A novel strategy for regio- and stereocontrol in [4 + 2] cycloadditions. Intramolecular diels-alder reaction of a sllyl acetal triene. Tetrahedron Letters. 31(45). 6585–6588. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026